Woo Skin - Shop now
$12.99 with 30 percent savings
Print List Price: $18.50

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Infinite Jest Kindle Edition

4.4 out of 5 stars 5,894 ratings

A gargantuan, mind-altering comedy about the Pursuit of Happiness in America 

Set in an addicts' halfway house and a tennis academy, and featuring the most endearingly screwed-up family to come along in recent fiction,
Infinite Jest explores essential questions about what entertainment is and why it has come to so dominate our lives; about how our desire for entertainment affects our need to connect with other people; and about what the pleasures we choose say about who we are.

Equal parts philosophical quest and screwball comedy,
Infinite Jest bends every rule of fiction without sacrificing for a moment its own entertainment value. It is an exuberant, uniquely American exploration of the passions that make us human — and one of those rare books that renew the idea of what a novel can do.

With a foreword by Tom Bisell. 

"The next step in fiction...Edgy, accurate, and darkly witty...Think Beckett, think Pynchon, think Gaddis. Think." Sven Birkerts, The Atlantic

 
Popular Highlights in this book

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

In a sprawling, wild, super-hyped magnum opus, David Foster Wallace fulfills the promise of his precocious novel The Broom of the System. Equal parts philosophical quest and screwball comedy, Infinite Jest bends every rule of fiction, features a huge cast and multilevel narrative, and questions essential elements of American culture - our entertainments, our addictions, our relationships, our pleasures, our abilities to define ourselves.

From Publishers Weekly

With its baroque subplots, zany political satire, morbid, cerebral humor and astonishing range of cultural references, Wallace's brilliant but somewhat bloated dirigible of a second novel (after The Broom in the System) will appeal to steadfast readers of Pynchon and Gaddis. But few others will have the stamina for it. Set in an absurd yet uncanny near-future, with a cast of hundreds and close to 400 footnotes, Wallace's story weaves between two surprisingly similar locales: Ennet House, a halfway-house in the Boston Suburbs, and the adjacent Enfield Tennis Academy. It is the "Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment" (each calendar year is now subsidized by retail advertising); the U.S. and Canada have been subsumed by the Organization of North American Nations, unleashing a torrent of anti-O.N.A.N.ist terrorism by Quebecois separatists; drug problems are widespread; the Northeastern continent is a giant toxic waste dump; and CD-like "entertainment cartridges" are the prevalent leisure activity. The novel hinges on the dysfunctional family of E.T.A.'s founder, optical-scientist-turned-cult-filmmaker Dr. James Incandenza (aka Himself), who took his life shortly after producing a mysterious film called Infinite Jest, which is supposedly so addictively entertaining as to bring about a total neural meltdown in its viewer. As Himself's estranged sons?professional football punter Orin, introverted tennis star Hal and deformed naif Mario?come to terms with his suicide and legacy, they and the residents of Ennet House become enmeshed in the machinations of the wheelchair-bound leader of a Quebecois separatist faction, who hopes to disseminate cartridges of Infinite Jest and thus shred the social fabric of O.N.A.N. With its hilarious riffs on themes like addiction, 12-step programs, technology and waste management (in all its scatological implications), this tome is highly engrossing?in small doses. Yet the nebulous, resolutionless ending serves to underscore Wallace's underlying failure to find a suitable novelistic shape for his ingenious and often outrageously funny material.
Copyright 1995 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B000S1M9LY
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Back Bay Books; 1st edition (April 3, 2009)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 3, 2009
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 2.2 MB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 1098 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.4 out of 5 stars 5,894 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
David Foster Wallace
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

David Foster Wallace wrote the acclaimed novels Infinite Jest and The Broom of the System and the story collections Oblivion, Brief Interviews with Hideous Men, and Girl With Curious Hair. His nonfiction includes the essay collections Consider the Lobster and A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again, and the full-length work Everything and More.  He died in 2008.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
5,894 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Customers say

Customers praise the book's rich universe of interweaving narratives and its ability to offer important information about the overall plot, while also appreciating its humor, with many laughing out loud while reading. The writing quality is highly regarded as masterful, and customers find it intellectually stimulating, with profound insights and deep characterization. The book receives mixed feedback regarding its readability and complexity, with some finding it wonderfully complicated while others describe it as a tedious boondoggle, and opinions vary on its length.

AI-generated from the text of customer reviews

249 customers mention "Thought provoking"176 positive73 negative

Customers find the book thought-provoking, praising its rich universe of interweaving narratives and important plot information.

"...the phonebook-esque length, the tiny, crimped font, and enticing plot described on the back ever since I spotted it on a shelf at Hastings during my..." Read more

"...and frightening, yes, and also funny, and always insightful into the human condition and especially the American pursuit of happiness and pleasure..." Read more

"...These two groups have interlocking narratives that are both surprising and revealing, and form the bulk of the novel's attention, including as a key..." Read more

"...There's not much plot here. I haven't talked much about the plot in the above content because there's just not that much to talk about...." Read more

173 customers mention "Humor"144 positive29 negative

Customers find the book humorous, with several mentioning they laughed out loud while reading, and one noting how the writing delivers numerous wry chuckles.

"...DFW boasted a very sharp and immediate sense of humor along his skills of prosaic manipulation...." Read more

"...It is, at times, gruesome and frightening, yes, and also funny, and always insightful into the human condition and especially the American pursuit..." Read more

"...elements are brought out - among other things - by an academic-sounding narrator (who seems mainly to be the author of the endnotes) whose primary..." Read more

"...The Endnotes are extremely important and can be very helpful and funny, his attention to detail adds depth to the places and characters..." Read more

86 customers mention "Writing quality"86 positive0 negative

Customers praise the writing quality of the book, describing it as masterful and all-consuming, with one customer noting it's written for other writers.

"...with the territory of maximalist writing, but while some passages of writing are fantastic, some passages are equally dull...." Read more

"...He loves their stories, he loves their words, and he loves writing. It's love. (For TD.)" Read more

"...Some of the writing is brilliant and emotive. Some of the writing is crude and boorish. Many of the characters are dysfunctional...." Read more

"...No contest. His vocabulary was prodigious, and his ability to write -- to describe people and things inside and out -- was truly gorgeous...." Read more

77 customers mention "Intelligence"60 positive17 negative

Customers praise the book's profound insights and deep characterization, noting its strong philosophical elements and understanding of human nature.

"...He is also the best at the littlest details of people behavior. [Reading him is in some ways like opening your eyes to the world for the first time.]..." Read more

"...The Endnotes are extremely important and can be very helpful and funny, his attention to detail adds depth to the places and characters..." Read more

"...is an idea-heavy novel with many strong philosophical, technical, intellectual, and meditative passages -- many of which are dazzlingly well written..." Read more

"...It's outrageous and hilarious and horrifying and deep. It's specific. It's witty. It's incredibly detailed and extremely descriptive. It's intense...." Read more

180 customers mention "Readability"71 positive109 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the book's readability, with some praising its spectacular language and all-encompassing nature, while others find it difficult and not a casual read.

"...There were times I could barely continue reading this work. I took approximately six months to finish it. I felt relieved when it was finally over...." Read more

"...from their own characters; while everything is beautifully and eloquently written, I often get a sense of coldness, as though the writers do not..." Read more

"...It is too multi-faceted, too many-layered, too all-encompassing. It doesn't even really feel like a book in some ways...." Read more

"...It's also really easy to highlight, bookmark, make notes of certain areas to revisit if you need...." Read more

123 customers mention "Complexity"61 positive62 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the book's complexity, with some finding it wonderfully complicated and brilliant, while others describe it as an extremely tedious boondoggle and difficult to follow at certain points.

"...I want to stress this point: reading INFINITE JEST is much easier on an eReader for a few reasons...." Read more

"...It's a very challenging and demanding work, and it seems designed for a very particular audience...." Read more

"...Yes, this is an idea-heavy novel with many strong philosophical, technical, intellectual, and meditative passages -- many of which are dazzlingly..." Read more

"...It's not a quick read it requires time and thought you cant just plow through it, It took me about 6 months to read the first half and than two..." Read more

114 customers mention "Creativity"77 positive37 negative

Customers have mixed opinions about the book's creativity, with some finding it audacious and thought-provoking, while others describe it as pretentious.

"...These two groups have interlocking narratives that are both surprising and revealing, and form the bulk of the novel's attention, including as a key..." Read more

"...sponsors is amazing, you can go back to this book and always find surprises and new meanings, its never dull or predictable, the ways to view things..." Read more

"...Same goes for the unconventional structure: most people know about the voluminous collection of footnotes, but there's far more intricacy to it than..." Read more

"...It's outrageous and hilarious and horrifying and deep. It's specific. It's witty. It's incredibly detailed and extremely descriptive. It's intense...." Read more

132 customers mention "Length"24 positive108 negative

Customers find the book's length overwhelming, describing it as a long slogging read with run-on sentences and overwriting.

"...This book is indeed incredibly long. INFINITE JEST is notoriously known for being a long book - it's just shy of 1100 pages...." Read more

"...know how to describe the emotional mark it left on me, The size can be intimidating and at first you can get frustrated because of the many jumps..." Read more

"...I could write a book about this book. “Infinite Jest” is a very lengthy, complicated, post modern novel, published in 1996, about life in a near..." Read more

"...As did the idea of a 1,000-plus-page work to get lost in. It was big. In seemingly every possible way...." Read more

Think of this as a big Box of Chocolates - and download the Audible version by Sean Pratt!
4 out of 5 stars
Think of this as a big Box of Chocolates - and download the Audible version by Sean Pratt!
After more than a decade of trying to read this incredibly dense tome, I finally became thoroughly engaged thanks to the wonderful reading on the Audible.com version by Sean Pratt. It is as rewarding a download as I have ever made. Pratt brings the text to life with passion and precisely the right tone and humor, as appropriate. What I quickly learned is that ere is no single narrative or plot that would engage me and drive me through the almost one thousand pages. Instead, the book is best seen as a huge, super heavy box of assorted chocolates (some of which you may totally hate!). So it is myopic to think of this as a "book about addiction." Sure, it's there. But so are countless related plots and subplots with a lot of humor, insight and brilliant ramblings. Examples of the rants I loved the most include the many musings about tennis, the separatist passions of the Quebecquoise, the wonders of the arc of a seventy-yard punt, and Captain Furrillo's relative strengths as the senior detective of Hill Street Bluess compared to the guy in Hawaii-Five O! So enjoy this wonderful ride and do not despair if you leave some of the chocolates for your mother or sister!
Thank you for your feedback
Sorry, there was an error
Sorry we couldn't load the review

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013
    Early on during my attendance at the University of Montana in Missoula, I attempted to read this book. I had been impressed by the phonebook-esque length, the tiny, crimped font, and enticing plot described on the back ever since I spotted it on a shelf at Hastings during my high school years. My copy had been purchased in 2006, the ten-year anniversary of the book's publication, and it had been marked down to $10 versus the typical $16 price tag; it had also been stamped as a special "anniversary copy."

    Sadly, a few pages in, I just didn't get it and resigned, eventually giving away that particular edition to a local used bookstore. The narrative described a plethora of details that seemed unnecessary to the plot (what plot? har-har) and I stopped reading once I encountered a sentence that made zero sense to me: "I would yield to the urge to bolt for the door ahead of them if I could know that bolting for the door is what the men in this room would see." Like, huh? What else would they see, Dave? I just couldn't bring myself to read another word. The book had already stopped playing by one of my cardinal rules, which was to always make sense to the reader, always.

    In a couple of years, things changed. Because of my college English lit classes, I was soon subjected to a barrage of mind-melting literature capable of completely changing the way I looked at fiction, especially the one-two punch of massive prose bricks Ulysses and Gravity's Rainbow, both of which had been paired with separate books written by scholars just devoted to explain the avalanche of random references and symbols. It soon became apparent to me that just because a book didn't always make sense or hit the usual narrative notes, it didn't always mean that it was an inferior work. Both Ulysses and GR equally frustrated and astounded me depending on which section I was reading, and they both eventually made their way onto my "favorite books" list due to their complexity and inimitable composition.

    And but so I went ahead and gave IJ another chance. For a college graduation gift, I had received my requested present of a 2nd-generation Kindle. I downloaded a free sample of IJ and found that it was the longest sample Amazon had (and still has) ever sent me - it hit close the 70-page mark in the physical book. I started reading and kept on reading until the end of the sample. Like a spaceship gravitating toward a gaping black hole, unable to turn itself away from the hole's crushing pull, I was compelled to outright buy the book and read the rest of it.

    I won't bother to waste my words here on the peculiar and sprawling plot, as it frequently defies description (and can be summarized in other reviews here). Same goes for the unconventional structure: most people know about the voluminous collection of footnotes, but there's far more intricacy to it than that. Instead, I will keep it brief and to the absolute essential of what you should know about this book: It is amazing. It really is. Ever since I read it, it still remains the best novel I've ever read. And a lot of people (including those who choose to read it as a part of "Infinite Summer") feel or will feel the same way.

    A lot of times, when I read a book for a certain length of time, I start feeling the itch to just hurry up and finish it as soon as possible so I can get onto the next book. It must be an addiction to novelty and newness or something, but it happens with almost every book I read: a desire to read every last word so I can soon stand in front of my bookshelf, twiddling my fingers with glee whilst weighing the options of what I'll read next. With IJ, that never happened. During the three months that it took me to read it, I had the sensation of feeling like 1100 pages were just not enough. With characters and concepts this unique and compelling, I needed at least another 2200 pages, minimum.

    Oddly enough, even though this is my favorite book as yet, it is by no means perfect. As hinted at by the "bolting for the door" line above, DFW does not always make complete sense and sometimes leaves you scratching your noggin, wondering what he meant. Nor is every single passage golden and hallowed: some sections go on and on to your detriment and consternation (I'm thinking specifically between the long-winded, philosophical conversations in the desert shared between Marathe and Steeply, easily the worst and most boring sections of the book).

    In addition, the book ends on an apparently random and unsatisfying note, leaving a lot of unresolved plot points and likely serving up a cold helping of dissatisfaction upon the first read-through -- the opposite of the warm and fuzzy feeling avid readers have of closing a book and thinking, "There was absolutely no better way that could have ended." (I'm planning on reading Chris Hager's lengthy and reference-laden undergrad thesis which defends and explains IJ's ending -- I just recently found it on DFW website "The Howling Fantods," but I haven't got the time right now to plow through it and underline important points with a pen.)

    Despite these downsides, however, there is so much stuff that just works: the chilling, deadly methods of the Wheelchair Assassins; Poor Tony Krause's nightmarish drug detox in a public library bathroom; Joelle Van Dyne's attempted suicide in the bathroom of a party; the apocalyptic Eschaton match; a hilarious description of the rise and subsequent failure of video-phone technology; Gately's robbery and accidental murder of M. DuPlessis early on in the book; and so much more. Joelle, Orin, Mario, Pemulis, John "No Relation" Wayne, and especially my main man Gately are all ranked among my favorite fictional characters ever written.

    One thing I dislike about some post-modern authors is their apparent clinical detachment from their own characters; while everything is beautifully and eloquently written, I often get a sense of coldness, as though the writers do not feel very much for or through their own characters. In this, there is a heavy lack of what I think of as "heart." (I sensed this frequently throughout Don Delillo's "White Noise," whose characters seemed kind of flat and emotionless.)

    DFW, on the other hand, put so much heart in this particular work that it's sometimes too much to take. Whether it's addressing the pain of addiction, the heartbreak of losing a loved one, the horror of child abuse, or the pure inability to connect with others or experience happiness, it's clear that DFW surely channeled many of his own fears and insecurities through his fictional creations and put much of himself down on the page as a result.

    In contrast, there are also many parts of the book that are simply and uproariously hilarious. DFW boasted a very sharp and immediate sense of humor along his skills of prosaic manipulation. The edifice of Ennet House Drug and Alcohol Recovery House[sic], Don Gately's shrewd but uneducated observations & criminal upbringing, and the overall world of consumerism gone horrifically wrong as encouraged by the rampant rise of corporations are all fertile fields for the novel's more humorous sensibilities. There were many times that IJ brought on a spate of giggling in me so pronounced that I had to just put down the book and allow it to pass before I could continue.

    Now, be advised that this book is not for everyone. Lord, no. Just because I and others enjoyed it so greatly does not mean that everybody will feel the same way. It's a very challenging and demanding work, and it seems designed for a very particular audience. Anyone hoping for a nicely-defined plot or simple themes will find him-or-herself quickly thwarted. Others looking for some kind of a point to the apparently pointless ramblings of admittedly inconsequential details or conversations that pack hundreds of pages, a lot of them enjoyable but ultimately unimportant to any overarching theme, will also go bananas with vexation.

    IJ was never designed to nab a Pulitzer or a National Book Award, never designed to go down in the annals of literary greatness as one of those books that speak volumes to whoever reads it over the span of centuries. I think that it will connect most with collegiate types who grew up Gen-X and beyond, the ones who have, as children or young adults, especially experienced the constant bombardment of unconscious marketing by huge conglomerates, as well as the ubiquity of "the entertainment" whether through television and video cassettes or (later on) DVDs and the Internet. Anyone who has grown up in this age of easy access to non-stop stimulation will likely understand what DFW intended to lambaste with this particular book.

    Now down to brass tacks: I own both the Kindle copy and the regular paperback edition (obtained at a used book sale along with a copy of Michael Chabon's The Yiddish Policeman's Union for a $1, probably the best used book purchase I've ever made). Given the size of this beast, I would heartily recommend the Kindle format for a first-time reader if you've got the appropriate technology. The Kindle version makes flipping back and forth between the main text and the footnotes a breeze, and let's face it, do you really want to lug that huge book around? (Unless maybe you're trying to broadcast to other people what it is that you're reading so you can more easily strike up a conversation with someone who has parallel literary tastes to you, to which I say go right ahead and get the door-stopper, then.)

    We lost a genius and heartfelt mind in 2008 when Wallace committed suicide, but at the very least, he has left behind this amazing and one-of-a-kind labor of love that continues to inspire and confound the people who read it long after he left us. Not sure if you'll enjoy the book or not? Try downloading the free sample. As far as I know, it's just as long as it was when I first began this massive undertaking, and it'll give you a very good sense of what you're about to experience for the next couple of months. If you're not the intended audience, you can always put the book down. But if you are, you'll find that you too can't stop reading, and your life will likely be as irrevocably changed as mine was by this extraordinary book. Welcome to Infinite Jest.
    273 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on February 21, 2011
    INFINTE JEST. (1996) David Foster Wallace.

    Everything you have heard, read, and that has been said about Infinite Jest is true. Should YOU read it? Is the only relevant question. This book is work--it's going into the gym and the classroom. (It is 1079 pages and holding it requires strength and strategy. And Kindle, iPod, or cd isn't a remedy because of the classroom aspect--you will want to highlight, and write in the margins; and it requires two bookmarks--one for the body and one for the endnotes.) This book, though a novel, is a journey into the mind of David Foster Wallace and is one long suicide (Wallace hung himself 12 years after publication at age 46) note. But it is not grim and dour. It is, at times, gruesome and frightening, yes, and also funny, and always insightful into the human condition and especially the American pursuit of happiness and pleasure along with the concurrent escape from discomfort and pain. And mostly about the inherent and ironic conflict between pleasure and pain--how the relief of pain into pleasure ultimately creates more pain, which causes one to seek more relief/pleasure, i.e. a psychological and physiological trap--a cage with no way out ... except maybe through a Twelve-step program which is SO boring so as to be not worth the effort. And then, there is reincarnation--which DFW never calls by name (something he does with the Psychoanalytic Reaction Formation, also) but which plays a huge part in the story. Both.

    Should YOU read it? I rank it as one of the four best books of all time. I lived with it for three weeks pretty much not doing anything else but reading and thinking about what Wallace was saying. I stopped drinking (One theme is addiction) and didn't bother to go out or watch any entertainment or do any work of my own (writing). It, the book, moved into my mind--took up residence in my apartment, became my roommate. Of course that is ironic also because the book's first name was "A FAILED ENTERTAINMENT," and the book is the most entertaining thing I've ever experienced - passively; but then it is work so it's not completely passive, as say watching something - "spectation" Wallace calls it. What the book is is inside the brain of a particular personality who happens to be a genius with a photographic memory (which again he doesn't name but describes: "Hal [a central character] can summon a kind of mental Xerox of anything he'd ever read and basically read it all over again, at will, ... ." (Pg. 797) I think parts of Wallace surface in all of the characters (there are scores of them) and what he does is to debate through interior and exterior dialogue, btw & w/in characters. Ideas/thoughts/philosophy (and of course this is discussed. He also critiques his own writing style via this, his technique,) Wallace's personality is, if categorized by the trait theory of The Big Five (OCEAN) [I think]: Extremely high O (open) slightly less but still very high C (conscientiousness), somewhat low E (extraversion, i.e Introverted), somewhat low A (agreeableness) and somewhat above average N (neuroticism). Add to that an extremely high I.Q. with that memory thing, a large physical presence (6'2, 200lbs.) and a cute and interesting face and you've got the man. If you think you can relate to those characteristics--you'll probably be taken by, and drawn into the novel as I was. [About being high O. Highly Open persons tend to be bored by people below them on the continuum, which looks like arrogance, elitism, snobbery, creative showoffishness, etc. Openness is the trait most associated with creativity. They also tend to be low in A (a `pussified' trait) for obvious reasons.]

    That by way of introduction. Briefly now, a look at Infinite Jest by way of the six elements of a story.

    Title: Perfect, either one. Defines the book.

    Plot: There is only a very almost inconsequential one. It is sometimes a distraction. It is about the relationship btwn the USA and Canada and the use and disposal/reuse of energy and territory. In an interesting way - it is woven into the pleasure/pain conundrum and so therefore worth some consideration. The personal and political intersect with, I think, some very bizarre drug enhanced imaginative thoughts and ideas. Free association.

    Characterization: There are three main protagonists. Hal Incandenza, a 17 yr.old, privileged white boy, at an elite youth tennis academy in Massachusetts; founded by his father (alcoholic) and run by his mother (OCD). Hal is addicted to marijuana and nicotine and a gifted and highly rated tennis prospect. He has younger residents/students/players he mentors, as well as two brothers who play prominent roles. Don Gately, a 29 yr. old, staff resident of a halfway house for recovering substance abusers, located adjacent to the tennis academy. Don is 9 months sober and oversees other recovering addicts. He is recovering from addiction to downers and a life of crime. Remy Marathe, (of unknown age) a legless Canadian, and member of a group of wheel chair assassins involved with the USA v. Canada's political/environmental/territorial mess. There are numerous sub-characters within these three facets of the story - the tennis academy, the halfway house, and the governments of the two countries. There is a prominent female character, Joelle van Dyne. She is involved with Orin Incandenza (Hal's older brother); James Incandenza (Hal's father); Mario Incandenza (Hal's younger, deformed, brother); and Don. She is also a person of interest i/r/t Remy's work. She is addicted to crack cocaine and a girl of exceptional beauty--the P.G.O.A.T.--the Prettiest Girl On The Planet. To me, none of the characters were all that likable.

    Setting: The story takes place mostly in and around Boston, Mass. USA in the near future [The book being written in the mid 90's.] year of 2007. It is spring through fall and there is rain, humid heat, and snow. The "action" is mostly in and around the tennis academy, the halfway house and the seedy underbelly of Boston. There is also the desert SW around Tucson. Wallace is the best I've ever read of painting landscape and cityscape with words. He is also the best at the littlest details of people behavior. [Reading him is in some ways like opening your eyes to the world for the first time.] The zeitgeist is a future that revolves around telecommunications and entertainment, both voice and video. It is eerily accurate i/r/t where we are today. [It was written pre Internet & wireless explosion.]

    Style: This is maybe where most people simply go batty and throw the book against the wall. There is no consistent POV or voice save for Wallace's. He breaks every rule (for writing) there is ... and yet he pulls it off. All the characters pretty much talk the same, with the same idiosyncrasies, i.e. Wallace's. He uses conjoined conjunctions up the wazoo: "And so but... That thus this is why... So and but that night's next ..." etc. He repeats words: "Then he considered that this was the only dream he could recall where even in the dream he knew that it was a dream, much less lay there considering the fact that he was considering the up-front dream quality of the dream he was dreaming." [then he adds, mocking himself] "It quickly got so multileveled and confusing that his eyes rolled back in his head." (pg. 830) Events are not lineal. Sometimes events and persons don't become clear for 100s of pages. He makes up words. He uses obscure words. He uses acronyms up the wazoo. He uses endnotes that are stories in and of themselves. The endnotes sometimes explain the main story. There can be page upon page w/o a paragraph break. His segues sometimes are just barely, and then ... the sidebar has next to nothing to do with anything except - the central theme(s). This is the where the personality factor of Openness factors in--if you're not of a like mind/brain--it'll drive you nuts. The story has no ending, the book ends.

    Theme: The strongest case for reading this book. DFW says the book is about: Tennis; Addiction; & Entertainment. It is that, and more. Some readers struggle with the minutiae of tennis. But the game of tennis and the discipline required is a metaphor for life, in Wallace's mind. This is what is taught at the academy, and also all the AA stuff, characters and references. Delay of gratification and effort and struggle are their own rewards ... blah,blah, blah and yada, yada. Life is a GAME and it is not about you or who wins that matters. Ironically--nothing matters. Addiction is covered from head to toe, from its genesis to its usually horrific conclusion. You think you're not, addicted, maybe you should read this book for that reason. Entertainment and the individual and that relationship- ship's- ships' (Wallace's style is infectious) exploitation by design and by fate (Never named.). Then there is the issue of control, choice, and self-determination, which is the underpinning of The Game, Addictions, & Entertainment. Is it (control) really just a delusion? So why not - seek pleasure and submit to ecstasy? And running beneath the underpinning is all the unnamed Freudian stuff (Also, never named.)--that childhood decides. That even the best of intentions can have disastrous consequences, and not even here to get into all the horror of the ubiquitous neglectful, abusive, and incestuous parenting stuff that Wallace explores. And finally [not really possible] Wallace's take on reincarnation--that YOU will be killed by a woman, and that that woman will be your mother in your next life.

    Got time? Time to explore who you are and why you do what you do--to step outside your cage and study yourself as subject? Take a vacation ... haha.
    84 people found this helpful
    Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
  • Grace Fu
    2.0 out of 5 stars Difficult to carry on
    Reviewed in Singapore on December 5, 2024
    Couldnt hold my interest.
  • Gonzalo Reversio
    5.0 out of 5 stars The best post-modern American novel since Gravitys Rainbow
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 25, 2019
    Having spent the last 6 years reading every single thing that DFW had written in a prolific and varied career, this remains, by far my favourite book of all time.

    I have read a number of books of a similar length, so upwards of 500k words or 1300 pages, namely, Gravitys Rainbow by Pynchon (laugh out loud funny!), Ulysses by Joyce (awful and felt like a torture, took almost a year to read I hated it so much!), War and Peace (deep and profound and philosophical, I feel I was too young, at 16, to truly understand its real themes), Atlas Shrugged by Rand (read most recently in just 6 weeks and my god was it preachy and needed an editor, desperately!) and it was Infinite Jest (a direct quote from Hamlet, 'a fellow of infinite jest') which I read in 5 months which I enjoyed the most.

    This is a thoroughly post-modern novel and books being a form of entertainment, is going full meta by being about the nature of entertainment itself.

    It present a world of a tennis academy, the nature of addiction, a dystopian future in which Mexico and the States and Canada united together into what DFW calls ONAN (Organisation of North American Nations). Canada, in this vision of the future, is a nuclear wasteland, where there prowl giant feral mutant rats, while Quebecois separatists are assassinating their enemies via a very unique style - by giving them a copy of a film on a VHS tape called, appropriately, 'The Entertainment' which the person puts into their VCR player and watches on loop until they die of malnutrition/exhaustion imposed on them by their inability to stop watching such a compellingly, addictively, entertaining film.

    DFW riffs on this theme in an earlier essay called 'De Unibus Pluram' (which you can find online for free) which was written on the back of the statistics, at the back-end of the 1980s, that the average American household spends 6 hours a day watching TV (it's probably considerably longer, 3 decades on!)

    So if you like the essay, I'd suggest you get the book.

    It is incredibly fresh and laugh out loud funny in an enormous amount of places. Once thing that will probably annoy people who buy the physical books are the endless footnotes and endnotes (some running for 10 pages and often having footnotes to the footnotes!) which are integral to the plot and for which you will probably require a separate bookmark at the back of the book to refer to. I read this book digitally and it very helpfully has hyperlinks allowing you to jump to the footnotes/endnotes and back to the main text at will. I suspect this book is a lot harder to read in physical form and there are some reviews that say they had to break the spice of the book to separate the final 150 pages - which is the footnotes, as otherwise, it is very difficult to read this novel.

    This novel is broadly about the nature of modern entertainment, addiction, tennis, drugs and a whole lot else.

    It is hilariously funny and self-aware. DFW is possibly the greatest fiction writer (and definitely THE greatest non-fiction writer) of his generation and he was a person who was both exceptionally smart and talented (at Amherst he was doing 2 dissertations simultaneously, one on philosophy and one on creative writing, the latter being published as The Broom of The System, his first novel, when most of his peers were struggling with just 1). He has written extensively on all sorts of topics, from AVN awards to lobsters in Maine, to tennis, Terminator 2, philosophy and mathematics (see his book Everything and More) and I am sure I am not doing justice to the sheer breadth of the things that he writes about with refreshing candour and incredible humour.

    He was also a tragic figure, hanging himself when changing anti-depressants in 2008. He did though, leave behind a hugely impressive body of work and Infinite Jest, in my opinion, having read everything he has written over the years, is his crowning glory. It is the most fun book of this length that I have ever read.

    As somebody who had to give up alcohol through recovery, the sections of the book concerning itself with AA is absolutely 200% accurate and my understanding is that DFW in fact spent many hours/days sitting through AA meetings and absorbing the fellowship's take on addiction and its trigger factors. It really reads like he knows exactly what goes on there - as he really did, in real life.

    DFW was a complex figure and there is a strong argument to be made that his best work, is, in fact, his NON-fiction (a supposedly funny thing I'll never do again, aboard a luxury cruise liner, will always remain the funniest bit of non-fiction I have ever read!). But in this humble reviewer's opinion, Infinite Jest, for its sheer scope, refreshing honestly, spot on observations and dialogue and just satire and humour - will push it close.

    DFW is one of the greatest minds of his generation, yet he writes in such an accessible manner in all his work so as to become something much, much more than just another crusty intellectual, speaking down to us to, plebs, from his high horse. I believe what he really is - he is a voice of his generation (80s and 90s) - and Infinite Jest is a testament to that.

    Of all the long, classic books, that people read (or more often take selfies with to show off their nauseating 'intellectualism' on Instagram - rather than actually read), think War and Peace, Atlas Shrugged, Capital In the 21st Century, The Brothers Karamazov, Anna Karenina, Finnegan's Wake, Ulysses etc and so forth, this is BY FAR the most fun book of its length and type.

    Infinite Jest is both sad, depressed and funny and even 25 years after it was published (in 1994) remains relevant to the modern age. In fact, its take on the very nature of entertainment itself perhaps foresaw the age of vanity and social media, as seen through the prisms of Tinder, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

    The end result is a triumph for a tragic figure who left us far too soon. His legacy, as both an acute observer and reader of people in his non fiction as he is in his fiction - is absolutely secure, and will remain so for a long time to come.

    I don't know to what extent DFW can pass for 'one of us, a man of the people' given his fairly privileged upbringing of being the son of 2 university professors (one in philosophy, one in English, and hence being exposed to both subjects from birth, pretty much) but the way he writes certainly speaks to his audience in a way that few writers (fiction, non-fiction and every shade in between) every succeed in doing.
    4 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Kate Caston
    5.0 out of 5 stars Outstanding Read.
    Reviewed in Australia on March 31, 2025
    This book is a masterpiece. I absolutely loved it. :)
  • im2s
    3.0 out of 5 stars とにかく長くてポスドモダンな外見の近代小説
    Reviewed in Japan on October 26, 2014
    日本語の情報がとにかく限られているので、参考までに。15年越し3度目の挑戦でようやく読了。最初にハードカバーを読み始めたときは、全く情報もなく、何が起こっているか分からないまま、とにかく頻繁に出てくる巻末の脚注(特に最初は麻薬類の説明ばかり)を読むのにも疲れて挫折。注が多いといっても、House of leavesのような、まだ本文との関連性が高いものが中心の脚注ではなく、興味のない人間には全く意味のない麻薬やジャーゴンの詳細な解説の中に、何が起こっているか理解するのに必須なものが埋もれていて、結局全部目を通さないといけない。少し前にKindle版がアップデートされて脚注へのリンクやX-rayが使えるようになっていることに気づいて、最初から読み直しました。Kindle版は非常に読みやすくなっています。また、Infinite jestに関する様々なwebsitesも出来ていて、それらを参照すると、かなり細かいことまで情報が得られるようになっています。特に最初の方はとにかく記述が断片的で、時間と場所も飛びまくるので、何らかのガイドが必要な気がしますが、250ページを超える頃からだんだんと記述はリニアーになります。特に後半は、ストーリーはほぼ一直線で、アメリカの最近のポストモダン風な小説に共通するのかもしれませんが、見た目と違って主題は孤独や家族、addiction等、意外と近代的・伝統的な印象を受けます。ただし、麻薬中毒者の意識の流れ的記述で何が起こっているか分からない部分が延々と続いたり(フォークナーの The sound and furyの最初のパートのvariationsが何度も出てくる感じ)、重要なイベントの記述が欠失して、全く関係なさそうなところにわずかにほのめかされる等、とにかく読者に対して不親切。これをパズルのように楽しめるかどうかでも、評価が大きく変わるでしょう。文章と内容は、時々心に響くところがあったり、一瞬きらめくようなところがあったりしますが、一方で、どうしようもなく単に饒舌に言葉が続いているだけで内容が全くなさそうな文章が何ページも続きます。結局最後まで読み通せましたが、完全に興味を失う局面が何度もありました。また、主に今世紀の最初の10年くらいが舞台になっていますが、出版後のコンピュータやメディアの変化が激しすぎて、細かいテクノロジーの説明がちょっと古びた印象を与えるところもあります。ジュニアテニス、メディア中毒、薬物中毒に興味がある人にとっては、これらに関する細かい情報をもっと楽しめるかもしれません。個人的には、もっと若いときに読破すべきだったと思います。いずれにしろ、非常に読者を選ぶ小説であることは確かかと。
    Report
  • Anthony.L
    5.0 out of 5 stars Le meilleur livre que j’ai lu de ma vie
    Reviewed in France on September 4, 2022
    Un vrai chef-d’œuvre, très expérimental sur la forme pour mieux servir le fond : comment notre quête de divertissement finira par nous aliéner et nous couper du reste du monde.

    Je n’ai jamais lu de personnages aussi bien décrits, y compris les secondaires. L’histoire, au départ plutôt opaque, s’éclaircit au fur et à mesures des pages. Et le style est magnifiquement riche, comprenant à la fois de beaux courants de conscience plutôt ardus et des dialogues à mourir de rire.

    S’il faut un peu se forcer pour les 100/150 premières pages, on prend ensuite beaucoup de plaisir à lire ce roman et on se perd totalement dans la narration.

    Mon seul avertissement est qu’il faut un niveau assez élevé en anglais pour le lire non traduit. Si vous estimez avoir moins qu’un vrai C1 en lecture, je vous conseillerait plutôt de le lire en français.

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?