Shop Captain America
$9.99 with 50 percent savings
Digital List Price: $19.99

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

eBook features:
  • Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

The Holocaust In American Life Kindle Edition

4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 48 ratings

This “courageous and thought-provoking book” examines how the Holocaust came to hold its unique place in American memory (Foreign Affairs).

Prize–winning historian Peter Novick explores in absorbing detail the decisions that moved the Holocaust to the center of American life. He illuminates how Jewish leaders invoked its memory to muster support for Israel, and how politicians in turn used it to score points with Jewish voters. With insight and sensitivity, Novick raises searching questions about these developments, their meaning, and their consequences.

Does the Holocaust really teach useful lessons and sensitize us to atrocities, or, by making the Holocaust the measure, does it make lesser crimes seem “not so bad”? Have American Jews, by making the Holocaust the emblematic Jewish experience, given Hitler a posthumous victory, tacitly endorsing his definition of Jews as despised pariahs? What are we to make of the fact that while Americans spend hundreds of millions of dollars for museums recording a European crime, while comparatively little is done to memorialize American slavery?

A New York Times Notable Book

Editorial Reviews

Amazon.com Review

In the first decades following World War II, Americans rarely discussed the Holocaust. Now, remembering the Holocaust has become a fundamental part of Jewish identity; gentiles, too, view the Holocaust as a touchstone of moral solemnity. In The Holocaust and American Life, Peter Novick asks why, and his answers are both sensible and shocking. He explains the immediate postwar silence about the Holocaust by reviewing the basics of cold war politics: just after the liberation of the concentration camps, Americans were called upon to sympathize with "gallant Berliners" who resisted the Soviets and built a wall against Communism--an "enormous shift from one set of alignments to another," Novick notes. Novick then leads readers through the series of events that brought the Holocaust to the forefront of American consciousness--the trial of Adolph Eichmann, the Six-Day War, the Carter administration's Israel policy, and the construction of the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C.

Among Novick's most controversial ideas is his assertion that American Jews spoke softly of the Holocaust at first because they didn't want to be seen as victims; later, Jews decided that victim status would work in their best political interest. Or, as Novick puts it, "Jews were intent on permanent possession of the gold medal in the Victimization Olympics." The Holocaust in American Life is as carefully researched and argued as it is polemical and probing. Novick does not suffer Holocaust deniers lightly, and he is empathic toward victims and survivors, but he has no tolerance for false sentiment. One wishes that more people would ask, as Novick does, what kind of a country would spend millions of dollars on a museum honoring European Jewish Holocaust victims instead of a monument to its own shameful history of black slavery. --Michael Joseph Gross

From Booklist

Why has the Holocaust, five decades after its conclusion, remained such a burning issue in the consciousness of Americans, both Jews and Gentiles? After all, most historical events fade from memory with the passage of time and the deaths of those who directly experienced the events. Yet, despite the occurrence of more recent and certainly quite horrific mass atrocities, from Cambodia to Rowanda, the Holocaust continues to play a central role in American public discourse. In this unsettling and fascinating work, Novick, a Jew and a professor of history at the University of Chicago, examines how a variety of domestic and foreign events have moved Holocaust consciousness to the center of American life and kept it there. The author unhesitatingly probes touchy subjects, including the role of Holocaust consciousness in cold war politics, the "uniqueness" of the Holocaust, and even the supposed "obsession" of American Jews (few of whom are Holocaust survivors) with the Holocaust. This is an important work that is bound to irritate, even outrage, many readers. Jay Freeman

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B003WUYQ2S
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Mariner Books (September 20, 2000)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ September 20, 2000
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 4472 KB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 587 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.7 4.7 out of 5 stars 48 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
Peter Novick
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.7 out of 5 stars
48 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2000
    This is one of the most intellectually stimulating books I have ever encountered. While few people with probably agree with everything the author has to say, he has written a thoughtful, thoroughly researched examination of how the idea of the Holocaust--and popular thinking about that tragedy among both Jewish and Gentile Americans--has evolved over the 60 years since the outbreak of World War II. He also has the courage to challenge conventional thinking as well as the beliefs of generally revered leaders like David Ben Gurion and Elie Wiesel.
    The book does an excellent job of linking popular thinking about the Holocaust with concurrent historical trends and developments, including the more intense American focus on the Pacific as opposed to the European theatre for much of the war, the lack of appreciation during and immediately after the war for the immensity of the Jewish genocide, the emergence of the Cold War (together with the "discovery" of common totalitarian threads between Nazism and Stalinism), the "rehabilitation" of Germany after Stalin took over Eastern Europe, changing views about "victimization" in American popular culture, the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem and Hannah Arendt's controversial analysis of it, the Arab-Israeli Wars of 1967 and 1973, as well as the decline in American anti-semitism in general at the same time that radical black activists were employing anti-Jewish rhetoric.
    One of the most important contributions of the book is its discussion of the alleged "uniqueness" of the Holocaust, which the author shows to be both historically inaccurate and dangerous in leading down the slippery slope where any other more recent catastrophes and disasters are minimized in comparison. Rich with example and documentation--the footnotes and endnotes should be read, too--the book is one I expect to return to in the future. Broad in its scope and well-written, it is generally quite persuasive in the arguments it advances.
    I would concur with those critics who fault the author's occasionally overly colloquial style, especially when he is discussing Holocaust deniers. His dismissal of them as "kooks" and "nut cases" detracts from the generally strong case he makes against them.
    40 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 9, 2005
    This excellent book could have only been written by an historian with ties to Judaism and much of it was destined to fall on deaf ears on both sides of the political/cultural divide. Being a non-Jew but interested in politics, this book seems to mesh well with other books that are nominally on the subject and my own experience. My favorite, aside from this one, is Culture of Critique by Kevin MacDonald which appears to have been received as a mixed blessing, like this one, by the "Jewish community" judging from some of the reviews and the author's comments in an update. It would be good to hear from Prof. Novick in this regard as both books appear to be well done academic works and the subsequent "debate" could add to the understanding of the controversial topic.

    Several books could help a serious reader, and Paul Johnson's History of the Jews, especially the last part on Zion, is among others in that category. The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein, Salvation is from the Jews by Roy H. Schoeman and The Politics of Anti-Semitism by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair are not academic works but provided this writer with some good background of the diversity of Jewish opinions on the subject.
    27 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2016
    Thanks to Dr. Richard L. Rubenstein, my life long primary study interest is the Holocaust and the theology of the Holocaust.
    2 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on November 1, 2015
    Enlightening and well worth the effort.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on August 24, 2006
    Before anything else, I'd like to comment on some previous (negative) reviews on this book, which said that it was, among other things, 'trite' and 'boring'. The word 'trite' in particular has been mentioned several times by previous reviewers. These 2 characterizations puzzle me, since they seem far from what anyone could say about 'The holocaust in American life'. Could this book be called controversial? Sure. Provocative? Perhaps. But trite and boring? No way. The book is interesting and fascinating. This just goes to show how, when lacking arguments, one can just accuse someone or something of being 'trite' and 'boring' and think they've expressed an opinion. What they have done in actuality is express a great big 'nothing'.

    Other reviews mention inaccuracies in Novick's book, or accuse him of discussing the representations and discourses of the holocaust, and not the holocaust itself in its historical details. But surely they're missing the point: Novick is looking at the American collective memory of the holocaust, he's looking at the way the discourse around the holocaust is shaped today, including how it was shaped in the past and how and why it has changed. So one could say Novick is a historian of the present moment, interested in how certain ways of talking about the holocaust contribute to the shaping not only of Jewish identity, but also of the identity of the victim, of what suffering means, of what an atrocity is etc. I fail to understand why this is criticized by some reviewers. It seems to me a perfectly legitimate goal, to document the way a discourse is shaped, separately from the actual historical facts of the holocaust as it happened in the '40s.

    Furthermore, what Novick does, he does very well. On a subject that is full of minefields and strong emotions, Novick manages to express his arguments clearly and persuasively. His main point (discussed by previous reviewers) is that the way the discourse around the holocaust is shaped in America today is far from self-evident: it was different in the past and could be different in the future. He stresses that a historical understanding of the events of world war 2 & of the holocaust do not lead to only one way of representing it and understanding it in today's culture.

    The Holocaust as historical event is one thing. The Holocaust as discourse today, as representation in cultural life, is another. Novick discusses the second, and is very critical of the uniqueness, unrepresentability, incomprehensibility discourse that seems prevalent today. He is also critical of the emphasis on the identity of victim which seems central not only to Jewish Americans, but also to various other groups. His critique is not at all a conservative one, i.e. 'get over it and get on with things'. Far from it, he stresses the importance of memory and history. What he does is question the way this memory and history of the holocaust is shaped and implemented, especially when people end up comparing different historical instances of suffering, always putting the holocaust on top, as the instance of suffering par excellence. Novick insists that such an approach is not only meaningless but also morally problematic: because, as he says, even if there had been 2 or 3 genocides of equal horror before Hitler's one, we would still have to say that what happened in Europe in the '40s was terrible and unique in some ways, similar to other catastrophes in others; we would still have to remember it and fight against anything like it happening in the future. Because really- do we need something to be unique in order to fight against it? The idea of uniqueness, Novick argues, is often used to really talk about an hierarchy of catastrophes, with the Holocaust on top, which can really only serve other goals, far from the actual historical understanding of the Holocaust.

    One important point to stress here: this idea of 'serving other goals' does not mean that there is any kind of conspiracy, any far fetched group which plans and plots about how the holocaust will be discussed. This couldn't be further from Novick's point. What he argues is rather more everyday. How all of us, you and I, discuss and understand the holocaust today, has to do with present needs and desires that we have: for example, the need to have a clear moral compass, a guide to show us what the absolute good and what the absolute evil is. It is to an understanding of these needs and desires of all of us that lead to certain ways of understanding the holocaust that Novick addresses his book.

    All in all, Novick's book is interesting, thought-provoking and actually a quick and easy read. Its main points are explained well, and I think anyone interested in this subject would find it a very good read.
    35 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on July 17, 2023
    I thought it is a new book. But there are writings inside!

Top reviews from other countries

  • J. Gordon
    5.0 out of 5 stars Rise of the Holocaust Memorial Cult
    Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 25, 2010
    First published in 1999, this book provides a scholarly account of the development of the role of Holocaust in America.

    It shows how the Holocaust, relatively little discussed in public in World War II and the 1950s and 1960s, has become the leading feature of Jewish identity in the US, and has become central to the way many Jewish organizations in the US present themselves and to the way that Jews are perceived: they have, in effect, become the People of the Holocaust, though Novick does not use this phrase. At the same time, the Holocaust has been `memorialized' as an ahistorical cult in the form of Holocaust remembrance within the context of a broader celebration of victimhood, which is very easily exploited for political ends. Others have, unsurprisingly, jumped on to Holocaust bandwagon, appropriating aspects of its imagery and status.

    The first half or so of the book, dealing with developments up to c. 1970, is excellent; the second half, which describes later developments, is also very good, but inevitably more controversial.

    Although the book is concerned with the US, many of the more general points apply much more widely. More than a decade after its publication it is still valid and well worth reading.
    For me, it answered many questions about the rise of Holocaust cult and its manipulation.
  • delia ruhe
    4.0 out of 5 stars Background reading for all Canadians
    Reviewed in Canada on September 22, 2009
    Many pro-Zionists -- Jews and non-Jews -- despise this book because it discloses the story of the instrumentalization of the Holocaust for political purposes. That must be a serious embarrassment, not just to pro-Zionists but to virtually all Jews, both in the Diaspora and Israel. I read this book because I suspected that it would help me understand better why the Canadian government has outsourced its foreign policy to Israel -- especially after so many decades of relative even-handedness with respect to the Israel-Palestine conflict -- and why our politicians are making such fools of themselves pandering to the Canadian Jewish establishment. Novick's book is one of several I've chosen to help me with these questions, and it has proved an excellent choice. (Avraham Burg's *The Holocaust is Over* is another very useful one.) I won't review Novick's book because that has already been done by readers here. But I will say something about its usefulness to me -- and perhaps to other Canadian readers.

    For many, many decades, Canada has been a vassal-state of the U.S., but this intensified with the signing of the Free Trade agreement back in the Mulroney days and intensified even more with the signing of NAFTA. But I think it was with the beginnings of the "war on terror" and the SPP (now apparently abandoned) that our policies and some of our institutions have become indistinguishable -- including our lobbying institutions. In Ottawa, as in Washington, a pro-Israel lobby appears to have politicians from both major parties (and even the NDP) by the short hairs, and a big part of that lobby's ammunition is accusations of something called the "new antisemitism," which is in fact the trend among Canadians of getting fed up with Israel's role as the spoilt brat of the Middle East. Americans bankroll Israel's periodic massacres of Arabs -- as in Lebanon in 2006 and Gaza in 2008-09 -- and Canada, along with other nations, gets to pay for the cleanup. Novick's book provides essential background for understanding how Israel gets away with this -- and why it will continue to get away with this indefinitely.

    As Novick explains, by permanently securing the gold medal in the "Victim Olympics" of the 1960s (it wasn't hard to get this medal, since the Jewish establishment was the only competitor), Jews have inherited perpetual innocence from their ancestors who perished in the Holocaust. In addition, the Holocaust has been sanctified and made unique -- i.e., no other genocide is as important or as sacred as the Shoah. Therefore, no other genocide really counts in the Victim Olympics.

    This sanctification of an atrocity seems to me very Christian. While the Christians have their tortured and bloody prophet nailed to a cross and dying in the blast-furnace of a Middle Eastern afternoon, Jews have their 6 million cadaverous ancestors shuffling into the gas chambers. The Christian tradition never stopped anyone from slaughtering innocents -- indeed, Christians since the time of Constantine have ridden into battle under the sign of the cross. Holocaust religion appears to be following in that bloody tradition, if the massacre of innocents in Lebanon and Gaza is any indication. The scriptural lesson of the Holocaust -- "Never Again" -- clearly exempts Arabs.

    I would recommend Novick to anyone seeking to understand these issues.

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?