Great Jones - Shop now
$9.99 with 50 percent savings
Digital List Price: $19.99

These promotions will be applied to this item:

Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.
Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the author

Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Lancelot Du Lethe (Mad Merlin) Kindle Edition

4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 14 ratings

The Arthurian epic that began in Mad Merlin continues in Lancelot du Lethe, the story of the greatest knight, paramour, and traitor the Round Table has ever known.

The story of Lancelot is one of striving for perfection only to fall short due to the sins of the flesh. But in Lancelot du Lethe the knight is only partially of the mortal realm. He and Guinevere share a mystical bond of which Arthur cannot be a part, for they are both of the bloodline of the fey, immortally destined to be betrothed. This ensuing war of loyalties and love threatens the uneasy peace not just mortal realm but of the entire netherworld of the multipantheons of gods as well.

Drawing from Joseph Campbell, and from sources both historical and literary, this is a new take on the story of Camelot's most famous knight, told as only the author of
Mad Merlin can.

At the Publisher's request, this title is being sold without Digital Rights Management Software (DRM) applied.

Shop this series

 See full series
There are 3 books in this series.
This option includes 3 books.

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Sir Thomas Malory meets Marion Zimmer Bradley head on in this unfocused retelling of the Arthurian legends. King began his version of the tales in Mad Merlin (2000); here, amid much gratuitous bloodletting, he finishes the job. As the title indicates, the book adopts the perspective of Lancelot, Camelot's greatest knight. Son to the king of Benwick, he loses parents and kingdom while still a child, and is reared by an "Aunt Brigid" of Avalon. Lancelot's capture by the Four Queens, his rescue of Guinevere from Meleagaunce and other familiar adventures are intermixed with a mishmash of Roman, Celtic and Christian mythology, loosely glued together by a paramysticism reminiscent of Bradley's The Mists of Avalon. Malory's and Bradley's works brilliantly exhibit their respective visions. Sadly, King's vision is less clear. In attempting to draw on Malory's heroic chivalry and Bradley's revisionist mysticism, he seeks the best of both worlds and ultimately achieves neither. King's flashes of brilliance, frequently found in his descriptions of natural images, don't compensate for a choppy, movie-influenced style that renders even potentially stirring scenes in laundry-list prose. Furthermore, too much of the book is devoted to a convoluted justification for Lancelot and Guinevere's betrayal of an unsympathetic King Arthur. Lovers of "The Matter of Britain" would do better to turn to King's sources rather than his results.

Copyright 2001 Cahners Business Information, Inc.

From Library Journal

Destined at birth to be Camelot's greatest knight and its deadliest foe, the child known as Lancelot grows up on the Isle of Avalon, unknowing of his fate. The author of Mad Merlin continues his fresh approach to the Arthurian legend with a story of timeless love in a mythical world touched by magic and the land of the fey. King's talent for vivid descriptions and deft characterization makes this saga of the legendary knight and his ill-fated love affair seem new. Recommended for most fantasy collections.
Copyright 2001 Reed Business Information, Inc.

Product details

  • ASIN ‏ : ‎ B005N8Y63G
  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Tor Books (February 17, 2003)
  • Publication date ‏ : ‎ February 17, 2003
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • File size ‏ : ‎ 1.7 MB
  • Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
  • Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
  • Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
  • Print length ‏ : ‎ 464 pages
  • Customer Reviews:
    4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars 14 ratings

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.
J. Robert King
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.

Customer reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
14 global ratings

Review this product

Share your thoughts with other customers

Top reviews from the United States

  • Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2015
    good book
  • Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2014
    This is a very different look at the story of Lancelot and Guinevere. Of all three books I liked this one the least. It was brilliant and I did enjoy it very much but I just felt that it lacked the fire of the other two. That, I have come to believe, is because Lancelot as a character was reactionary rather than proactive. Life happened around him and he responded to it - at time heroically but he did little that was not in reaction to circumstance. This I suppose is what made him so different from Arthur who sought to mould the world around him and create something different than what had always been. It is however a story rich in detail and fraught with betrayal that isn't betrayal and yet in the end it is what divides them all. I would read the other two first and then this as it rounds both out in many ways and fills in some blanks that the other two left open to speculation.
  • Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2003
    Lancelot du Lethe is the second book featuring King's unique take on the Arthurian legends. Gone are the various pantheons of gods, as this book is mostly about the land of Britain itself, its ties with the Fey folk, and how Christianity is pushing everything aside. King plays with the legends even as he includes many things that we all know and love about them. This is a better book than the first and it doesn't contain any of the problems the first book had. It does, however, have a couple of its own.
    As good as Mad Merlin was, this book is just so much richer that it's hard to believe. Anybody familiar with the Arthurian legends knows of the ill-fated love between Guinevere and Lancelot, and how the betrayal of Arthur affects Camelot and everything around it. While sticking to the basics of the legend, King adds so much more to the tapestry that it reads like a new tale. While Mad Merlin added the war between the gods, Lancelot du Lethe adds a great deal of detail to the land of the Fey, and the magical world that lies beneath and between the real world of man. Guinevere is of this land, and while she is married to Arthur in order to bring peace and stability to the land, she is drawn to Lancelot and his otherworldness. He harbours a secret of his own and draws her to him even more, a secret that even he doesn't know about. They are fated to be lovers as well, and this adds the main conflict to the story. The choices that King has the characters make are hard choices, and there are always consequences to them. He doesn't give them an easy way out like some authors do.
    Guinevere is much more developed in this book than the last one. It was about Arthur and Merlin, and Guinevere was mainly a means to an end, a character that served a purpose and wasn't a whole lot more. Here, though, she comes into her own. She is a kind and good queen, but she is a woman who is living in a sexless marriage because if she gives in to Arthur, everything will be destroyed. When Lancelot shows up, she is inexplicably drawn to him. Their romance is tragic, even more tragic than in many tellings of the legends. Lancelot is a good man as well, and he knows what he feels will hurt Arthur. He continues to try and deny his feelings but he feels like he must follow his heart. King masterfully tells the story of how they dance around each other and their feelings, and Arthur's feelings as well, until ultimately something has to give. These are all good people, and the reader feels the tragedy even more because of that.
    Other characters are not so well drawn, as they interact with these three only peripherally. I sometimes questioned the choices King made in this. Morgan le Fay and her son Mordred don't really come across very well. Morgan has plans for Lancelot but these plans are foiled more out of authorial fiat than by anything Lancelot actually does. She does have a hand in the tragic ending, much like in the legends, but she plays a relatively minor role overall. This is a shame because she's in the book a lot, and always lurking in the background and behind Mordred's plans as well. Mordred also doesn't come across as very interesting, and if King wasn't keeping to the basics of the legend, I would have liked to have seen a more interesting villain. As it is, his character is given more weight by his place in the stories that King is using than by King himself. And Merlin only makes a couple of token appearances. His first appearance is superfluous, however, and his second only provides a story element before he goes back to his wonderful life with his lady love. I think it would have been a better book either without him, or with a meatier part to the story.
    Again, King does a wonderful job with the tools he is given and extrapolates very well, giving the story a fresh feel even as we know the basics of what is going to happen. The prose is again wonderful, with rich descriptions and vivid scenes. The interesting thing is how he extends the tales, and King delivers in spades. Sure, there are familiar items: other knights (Galahad, Gawain), the Holy Grail and the Spear of Longinus). However, the rich descriptions of the fairy world, the way King uses the fairies to supplement the intrigue in the real world, and the tragic elements King adds to the romance, all do their jobs nicely. Even when you know what's going to happen, you really don't. That's the perfect way to retell a legend.
    There is another minor problem with the book, however. This is the almost anecdotal feel to the book. It almost seems like a set of stories with an overarching theme, almost like a "Stories of King Arthur and the Round Table" with stories that mainly center on Lancelot. While this may give it a feel of the old legends, I found it kind of distracting in a 450 page book that's not really a short story book. This problem is alleviated later on once events start rolling down the hill to their inevitable oblivion. But at first, it is a problem.
    I will say that the ending is very fitting, though. King really outdoes his first book there. It's tragic yet it also has a glimmer of hope. It also provides the perfect bookend with the first book. Together, they make a wonderful visit to the land of Arthur, taking you back to the old days of jousts, chivalry, warriors in plate armour, and romance. I had a great time on my trip.
    David Roy
    9 people found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on September 27, 2006
    It's always a joy to find new Arthurian fiction that isn't a simple rehash of the tales we're all familiar with. This book focuses on a character that's typically marginalized and misunderstood: the oft-criticized Lancelot. The author's take on the character follows very closely with the work of Malory, but breathes a refreshing new life into his tragic relationship with Guinevere by introducing fey themes and magic that is missing in most modern 'ultra-realistic' stories of today.

    As the recent 'King Arthur' movie proved, the story of King Arthur, Camelot, and his Knights loses most of its enduring appeal when you remove the mythical and magical elements. Thankfully, the author didn't fall into the same trendy trap with 'Lancelot du Lethe'.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2006
    This book is wonderful. Guinevere, Lancelot and Otherworld take on yet greater roles in the story of Camelot and its King. Here we can understand why the triangle of king, knight and queen had such force... None was greater than the other. Three rulers*** fighting for their worlds and their hearts.
  • Reviewed in the United States on December 7, 2003
    As a lover of Arthurian ledgend, I snatched up Lancelot Du Lethe eager to explore the story from Lancelot's point of view. While I found the book an easy and interesting read, I also found it about 50 pages too long. I could easily have enjoyed the story with a few less descriptions of the pixies and gnomes and other woodland creatures of fantasy. They were distracting to the excitement of the story and added a childish twist that was at the very least unnecessary and at the very most - insulting. I knew King's work - having first read Le Morte D'Avalon and knew his propensity toward magic so I should have been forewarned. If you do not appreciate an abundance of spells, time warps and impossible underwater travel - this is not the book for you. With any Arthurian legend there will be some aspect of myth- but King really knocks it out of the park. I wondered if he didn't delve deeply into the unexplainable, because he lacks a grasp of any possible historical aspects on which to base his story. I found this to be a mixture of bits and pieces of the legend which other authors such as Cornwell, Bradshaw, McKenzie and even Miles tell more skillfully. Now -it was a VERY fast read and I did like the perspective. Unfortunately, I found Lancelot and Guinevere well developed while the other characters suffered. I did not read his first book Mad Merlin due to a personal disinterest in the main character. If you are eager to explore King's work - you may want to start at the beginning and see if it carries along from book one to book three.
    One person found this helpful
    Report
  • Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2013
    This book isn't as good as Mad Merlin, but it's still a great addition to the trilogy. I have yet to finish it, but so far so good.

Report an issue


Does this item contain inappropriate content?
Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Does this item contain quality or formatting issues?