Learn more
These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
Listening for Madeleine: A Portrait of Madeleine L'Engle in Many Voices Kindle Edition
Writer. Matriarch. Mentor. Friend. Icon.
Madeleine L'Engle is perhaps best recognized as the author of A Wrinkle in Time, the enduring milestone work of fantasy fiction that won the 1963 John Newbery Medal for excellence in children's literature and has enthralled millions of readers for the past fifty years. But to those who knew her well, L'Engle was much more besides: a larger-than-life persona, an inspiring mentor, a strong-willed matriarch, a spiritual guide, and a rare friend. In Listening for Madeleine, the renowned literary historian and biographer Leonard S. Marcus reveals Madeleine L'Engle in all her complexity, through a series of incisive interviews with the people who knew her most intimately. Vivid reminiscences of family members, colleagues, and friends create a kaleidoscope of keen insights and snapshop moments that help readers to understand the many sides of this singularly fascinating woman.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
From School Library Journal
From Booklist
From Bookforum
Review
“Mr. Marcus's immensely readable and fascinating book will . . . stand as the definitive portraity of Madeleine L'Engle.” ―James Kennedy, The Wall Street Journal
“Insightful . . . Impressionistic and satisfyingly complex.” ―Publishers Weekly (starred review)
“A fascinating book and an excellent introduction to both L'Engle and her work.” ―Booklist
“Though we never met, Madeleine L'Engle has been a close friend for years―for decades. Her story is presented here in the recollections of fifty comrades, and I gladly pull up a chair to listen in.” ―Margaret Edson, author of Wit
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Listening for Madeleine
A Portrait of Madeleine L'Engle in Many VoicesBy Leonard S. MarcusFarrar, Straus and Giroux
Copyright © 2012 Leonard S. MarcusAll right reserved.
ISBN: 9780374298975
MARY “SISTER” L’ENGLE AVENT
Mary “Sister” L’Engle Avent was born and raised in Jacksonville, Florida. She and Madeleine L’Engle were cousins.
Q: How did you meet Madeleine L’Engle?
A: Her grandmother Caroline Hallowes L’Engle Barnett was my aunt—the sister of my father, Camillus Saunders L’Engle. Madeleine was two years older than me and about six years old when I first knew her. She and her parents would occasionally come down to Jacksonville, Florida, from New York by train. They would come to visit her grandfather and her grandmother, who by then had separated. It was a very ugly kind of situation.
What happened was that Mr. Bion Hall Barnett, having sired four children, told my aunt—Madeleine’s grandmother, whom I called Aunt Lina—that he wanted a divorce.1 Her answer to him was “We don’t get a divorce in this family.” She flat out refused to divorce him. “You will be my husband,” she told him, “until I die.” Mr. Barnett had fallen in love with a young Frenchwoman. When Aunt Lina said no to a divorce, he took the new love of his life and her two daughters and went with them to live in France. After a while, the future Mrs. Barnett, who was a devout Catholic, got tired of living with Mr. Barnett as a companion, and so he adopted her as his daughter! Then, when Aunt Lina finally died, he did marry her, but not before opening a very large account with the pope in order to “unclaim” her as an adopted daughter. Eventually, Mr. Barnett and his new wife moved back to Jacksonville. She died before he did. This was a great scandal in the 1920s in a small city like Jacksonville. Everyone in Jacksonville knew the story, and it hung like a cloud over Madeleine’s head, because people felt very sorry for her grandmother. It was a very embarrassing situation.
My earliest impressions of Madeleine were not very favorable. She didn’t know how to play like the rest of us girls. For example, she didn’t know how to ride a bicycle, which was a favorite thing for us girls to do. Her grandfather lived at the Park Lane Apartments, which was located in a beautiful setting along the banks of the St. Johns River, by a park that was a good place for bicycling. Both her parents would say to Madeleine, “You’ve got to play with Sister”—Sister was my nickname—“this afternoon.” Well, that wasn’t what she wanted to do. My mother would say, “Cousin Madeleine [Madeleine’s mother] wants you to come down and be with Madeleine.” And I would say, “Oh, yuck, Mom. I don’t want to do that!” She was such a loner, always writing or reading. Her father was a New York theater critic, and when they were up north, her parents were often out at night, leaving her alone or with her nanny. As I later realized, her behavior was due in part to her having spent so much time by herself during her early life while her mother and father were out seeing plays.
Jacksonville was a small, quiet, beginning-to-come-up town. Florida had not been found yet, really. Henry Flagler had built the Florida East Coast Railway through Jacksonville on its way to Miami. The banks in town were very strong, as was the practice of law. Lumber was big and the port was good. Jacksonville sits on the St. Johns River, which flows into the Atlantic Ocean about eighteen miles away. It’s a huge river, and so shipping was good. About forty miles away, St. Augustine was quite a place of note as a vacation resort. In the summer, the men in Jacksonville all wore white linen suits. When seersucker suits became fashionable, my father would call them his “downtown pajamas.”
Jacksonville had a garden club and two country clubs—one group had gotten mad at the other and built a little farther out of town. There was the side of the river that you lived on and the other side, which had not yet been developed. In 1933, when Madeleine’s parents returned from living in Europe, they bought a house in Jacksonville. It was a nice house but not very grand, and it was on the wrong side of the river. It was not in Riverside or Avondale, which were considered the two good neighborhoods, but closer to town, and it was not far from her grandmother’s beach house.
Madeleine was very close to her grandmother, who had her own apartment in the Park Lane Apartments as well as a great house down at what is now called Jacksonville Beach. We called it Pablo at the time. Madeleine loved to go there, in part because it was a good place to be alone. The house, which was named Red Gables and which I think is gone now, was one of our favorite, favorite places. It was right on the ocean, along a part of the beach that had not yet been “found.” It was a comfortable, rambling old wooden house with big porches and long windows because you counted on the breeze to cool it. It was furnished informally with wicker furniture, that kind of thing. Very few people lived at the beach all year round and Red Gables was Aunt Lina’s summer house, but she would stay there a great deal of the time, and Madeleine would go down there a great deal, too.
Madeleine’s mother was the oldest daughter of four in her family, very nice-looking but a little on the shy side, very pleasant but not really warm. She spoke in a quiet voice with a southern accent. She had been raised in Jacksonville but long before my time. Then she married this gentleman from the North who had been badly hurt during World War I, and they had lived together in New York in circumstances completely unlike anything here in Jacksonville. So Madeleine’s mother knew two different worlds, and I think she may have felt about New York the same way that Madeleine felt about Jacksonville.
As a New Yorker, Madeleine was completely oblivious to the southern customs of the time. She was always polite, but she was also shy. Between one thing and another, she had a very hard time with us and we with her. When we girls were in our late teens and were all making our debuts and being introduced into the hierarchy of society, Madeleine remained very much the outsider. She would be invited to many of the parties, and she would always say that she couldn’t stand the food. We had lots of luncheons, at which chicken salad was always served. Madeleine said she didn’t like chicken salad. She was just completely out of place at that time and in that part of the world.
Her one close friend in Jacksonville was Pat Collins [later Cowdery], and they were very close.2 Pat was a delightful, lovely person, very cordial, very open, and she was exactly Madeleine’s age. When Madeleine’s family moved to Jacksonville, Madeleine was sent to boarding school in Charleston, South Carolina. But prior to going off to Smith College, in order to prepare for some entrance or placement exams she was going to take, Madeleine enrolled in summer courses at the Bartram School for Girls, which was a small local private school, and I think that that is where she and Pat became good friends. She and Madeleine remained close even late in life.
As a grown-up, Madeleine would sometimes come down to Jacksonville by herself and head straight for Orange Park, where Pat’s family had a house. Orange Park is a small community out on the St. Johns River, ten miles out of town, where the houses are spread far enough apart that you have no near neighbors. We say it is “in town but out of town.” When you are in Orange Park, you feel completely away from everything. Out there, Madeleine had no social obligations. She didn’t have to be anyplace that she didn’t want to be or listen to other people discuss among themselves what they had had that day for lunch. She could just be herself and be with Pat and relax. Madeleine might be there for ten days or two weeks without anybody knowing it.
My grandparents John Claudius L’Engle and Susan Philippa Fatio had eleven children, all of whom were born and lived in the Jacksonville area. So the woods were full of L’Engles. If your name was L’Engle, it was generally something to be very proud of. But then you could have killed some of the others who were also named L’Engle. We would say, “He might be my cousin, but I don’t know him!” So you would pick and choose.
My father’s younger sister, my aunt Tracy L’Engle, was very much intrigued by the theater.3 She had vague fantasies about being an actress and thought she should have been accepted immediately. She wrote poetry as well, but I would say that all in all she was far better known for her temper. Tracy lived in New York for quite some time, although I don’t think she pursued her dream of the theater too seriously while there.
Tracy was a character, and Madeleine knew her well. They probably met when Madeleine was in her teens, which would have been in the late 1930s. Madeleine was very comfortable with my aunt, who had graduated from Wellesley and had a mind of her own. She was haughty. Her two brothers were older than she, and come World War I, they were married with children. When neither of the brothers offered their services to their country, Tracy said, “By damn, if you all are such weaklings, I’m going to go!” And so she did, running military canteens, giving the soldiers their mail, that kind of thing. She had a uniform and was proud of it. And she was very ashamed that her two brothers hadn’t enlisted in the service. She was very strong and adventurous; in fact, “strong” is a very weak word for Tracy! At one time when she was still quite young, she became so upset with her father after he had reprimanded her that she moved out and never spoke to him again. After that incident, she lived with us instead. Madeleine looked up to her. She and Tracy were very much alike. They were very determined to do things their way, and to hell with what anybody else said.
There is a saying in the L’Engle family that refers to the fact that we’re all stubborn and that we have all got our own ways. You might say to one of your relatives: “You have certainly inherited a lot of the L’Engle-arities!” Madeleine had all of the L’Engle-arities. The Barnetts were pretty strong themselves, so you can imagine what that added up to. Mrs. Barnett—Madeleine’s grandmother—was a L’Engle too, so she got it on both sides.
Madeleine’s name was a combination of her mother’s name and her grandmother’s name. She named her own son after her grandfather Bion Barnett. Madeleine also had an uncle named Bion, who was her mother’s youngest brother. That Bion Barnett was a writer and an artist, although I don’t think he made a living by either.4 His oil paintings—landscapes and beach scenes, scenes from around the river—were lovely, and he did sell them on occasion. But people liked his paintings because the scenes were familiar, and his banker father paid his bills. He too married a French girl. I’m sure that he and Madeleine knew of each other. Bion’s oldest daughter wanted to be a writer as well.
I had not seen Madeleine for a long time when she and I got together for a very brief visit, in New York, probably in 1941. This was the one and only time I saw her in New York. She spoke about wanting to be on the stage. We chatted and asked each other what we were doing, and then we said goodbye. It was a very brief visit. She was not the friendly type, and I still couldn’t understand her aloofness. She couldn’t understand how I could be so flighty and gregarious. Her life and mine were just so different. By then we had at least become mature enough to acknowledge each other’s differences. As far as she was concerned, I was a cousin from Jacksonville. As far as I was concerned, she was a cousin from New York.
In later life—I would say during the 1970s—I saw Madeleine twice in Jacksonville. Once she gave a graduation talk at Bartram, the school where she had done her summer studies. She gave another talk at Bolles, which started out as a military school for boys and which later merged with Bartram. Madeleine had become very friendly with Bartram’s two headmistresses. I went to hear her speak on both occasions and was completely mesmerized. She was very cool and calm, with a little bit of a sophisticated humor. The audience all loved her. They saw her as a good writer who had once lived here and had come back to town.
I have most of Madeleine’s books. I bought them myself. You’ll get a lot of Madeleine’s history from The Summer of the Great-Grandmother, which I thought was an accurate description. There are still several Barnetts here. But I guess I am the last of the L’Engles of Jacksonville.
Copyright © 2012 by Leonard S. Marcus
Continues...
Excerpted from Listening for Madeleine by Leonard S. Marcus Copyright © 2012 by Leonard S. Marcus. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- ASIN : B008NA411I
- Publisher : Farrar, Straus and Giroux (November 13, 2012)
- Publication date : November 13, 2012
- Language : English
- File size : 3.7 MB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 383 pages
- Page numbers source ISBN : 0374298971
- Best Sellers Rank: #698,389 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #55 in Family & Parenting Literature Guides
- #208 in Children's Literary Criticism (Books)
- #1,304 in Biographies & Memoirs of Authors
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Dana Catharine de Ruiz was born in New York and brought up there, and in Northwestern Connecticut where she met the man she ultimately married, Mario Ruiz Santillan. They moved to the provincial capital of Guanajuato, in the center of Mexico, where she studied drawing and printmaking with Jesús Gallardo, at the school of Artes Plásticas de la Universidad de Guanajuato, and taught languages at the Centro de Idiomas there. She and her husband traveled the country playing Medieval and Renaissance music with Las Flautas Barrocas de Guanajuato, and Los Tiempos Pasados.
Much of Catharine de Ruiz's writing is informed by her love and understanding of Mexico, where she lived for many years. Unlike many Americans who move to a foreign country, she lived an almost entirely Mexican life. Her ability to speak Spanish fluently allowed her to live her experiences profoundly.
The contrast between her life in the central, provincial capital where she lived and worked and the Northeastern United States where she grew up provokes constant meditations on life, many of which she writes about in her blog, LaOtraMexicana.wordpress.com
Her first published illustrations will appear in the spring of 2018, in Susana Buckley's delightful and appetizing memoir, 'Eating with Peter'.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book fascinating, with one review describing it as a nuanced look at the writer. They appreciate its readability, with one customer noting it's a must-read for Madeleine L'Engle fans.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book fascinating, with one customer noting it provides a nuanced look at the writer.
"...L'Engle fan, who actually met her, I found this book to be quite fascinating. I couldn't put it down...." Read more
"I LIKED THE BOOK--IT WAS VERY INSIGHTFUL THOUGH I DID FIND HER BEHAVIOR AT TIMES A BIT TEDIOUS--POSSIBLY EVEN..." Read more
"...She had some troubling flaws but she was also a marvelous giving person who has by God's grace given us an amazing legacy in her books...." Read more
"Enjoyable read for those who enjoy Madeleine L'Engle Fun perspectives and insights from those who knew her Good Read" Read more
Customers find the book readable and interesting, with one noting it's a must-read for Madeleine L'Engle fans.
"...It is not what I expected it to be when I ordered it, but it was a wonderful book...." Read more
"An excellent book. I really appreciate that Mr. Marcus put this together...." Read more
"Enjoyable read for those who enjoy Madeleine L'Engle Fun perspectives and insights from those who knew her Good Read" Read more
"...Worth reading." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 27, 2012As a major Madeleine L'Engle fan, who actually met her, I found this book to be quite fascinating. I couldn't put it down. It is not what I expected it to be when I ordered it, but it was a wonderful book. In the end, it gives one a good picture of what Ms. L'Engle was really like: a gifted writer who was put on a pedestal by many, but who was a complex human being, like everyone else. I highly recommend this book, especially for Madeleine L'Engle fans.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 10, 2018I LIKED THE BOOK--IT WAS VERY INSIGHTFUL THOUGH I DID
FIND HER BEHAVIOR AT TIMES A BIT TEDIOUS--POSSIBLY EVEN
INSUFFERABLE--BUT I THINK IT WAS AN ACCURATE ACCOUNTING
OF A FAVORITE AUTHOR--WHO LIKE JK ROWLING--HAS OPENED
SO MANY DOORS FOR A GENERATION COMING ALONG--
HER 'TIME QUARTET' IS AN AMAZING GIFT FOR THE GENERATION
COMING NEXT
- Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2018An excellent book. I really appreciate that Mr. Marcus put this together.
The New Yorker piece in '04 was so disturbing, and Marcus did us all a service by putting some balance and perspective to that. I suspect that was his goal but he didn't say that. After reading this book I went back to the New Yorker piece and it didn't look so bad. The combination of this book and that article give me a lot to consider. Like a lot of people, L'Engle's work has been really important to me from the time I first read A Wrinkle in Time in 1968 at age 9, to the present day. Her work gives me a lot to think on, and what all these people have said about her gives me a lot to think on. So she wasn't perfect. She had some troubling flaws but she was also a marvelous giving person who has by God's grace given us an amazing legacy in her books. I will continue to think on what I have read here as well as the Zarin New Yorker piece, together with L'Engle's books which I continue to read and re-read. One thing this book cemented in my mind is just how massive is the number of people who have been deeply touched by Madeleine L'Engle. The format of the book is really interesting because it allows us to see the various different impressions so many people have had of her. That's reality. It shows something of the complexity of how things really are. Different people pick up on different things.
- Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2019Enjoyable read for those who enjoy Madeleine L'Engle
Fun perspectives and insights from those who knew her
Good Read
- Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2013This book was for a school project was supposed to be on her life but only had a few chapters on her the rest were her writings not exactly what we were looking for.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2013Madeleine L'Engle opened my eyes to worlds I never knew existed. However at various times I had difficulties with her/her writing/her teachings. This book is a nuanced look at the writer - warts and all - from many different perspectives. Worth reading.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2013A must read for all Madeleine L'Engle fans. This book describes her as a whole person, from the perspectives of the many people who had encountered her. She was a very interesting individual.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 15, 2014I found portions of this book fascinating. At least until the last section, "Icon" which ended the book in a mean spirited tone. Coming to the end of the book, I couldn't help but wonder if, rather than being an illuminating look at a rich and complex woman, it was meant to be nothing more but a defense for the New Yorker article referenced so often in the text. That the author of that piece got the last word cemented the feeling that the overarching purpose was to topple a beloved "icon."