Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Belisarius: The Last Roman General Kindle Edition
Back in the 6th century, Belisarius twice defeated the Persians and reconquered North Africa from the Vandals in a single year at the age of 29, before going on to regain Spain and Italy, including Rome (briefly), from the barbarians. This book discusses the evolution from classical Roman to Byzantine armies and systems of warfare, as well as those of their chief enemies: the Persians, Goths, and Vandals. Belisarius: The Last Roman General reassesses Belisarius’s generalship and compares him with the likes of Caesar, Alexander, and Hannibal. It is also illustrated with line drawings and battle plans as well as photographs.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPen & Sword Military
- Publication dateJanuary 15, 2009
- File size12859 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
The NYMAS Review
About the Author
Ian Hughes, trained in classics at Cardiff University, Wales, is currently teaching in England.
Product details
- ASIN : B0091WB5X4
- Publisher : Pen & Sword Military; Reprint edition (January 15, 2009)
- Publication date : January 15, 2009
- Language : English
- File size : 12859 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 481 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #841,551 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #216 in Ancient Military History (Kindle Store)
- #426 in Ancient Rome Biographies
- #780 in History of Medieval Europe
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Ian Hughes was born in Burnley, Lancashire, and attended Heasandford Junior School, Barden High School, and Burnley Grammar School.
He worked as a garage mechanic and librarian before entering the Fitted Kitchen Industry. Leaving work to study full time, he attended Cardiff University. After gaining an MA in Ancient History and Society he became a teacher. Following the birth of his son he gave up teaching and became a writer.
For more information go to: http://www.ianhughesma.com/
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
When I saw this new biography, I snapped it up immediately. Having read the previous biography by Lord Mahon written over 150 years ago, as well as the complete works of Procopius, the History of Agathias, the Chronicle of John Malalas, the Paschal Chronicle, etc., I was impressed with how Hughes made use of the considerable primary source material at his disposal. Most heartening of all, he does not rely overmuch on the scandalous "Secret History" and does not spend more time than is warranted on the supposed sexual escapades of Belisarius's wife, Antonina. To his further credit, Hughes avoids a particular bugbear of mine--blaming Pope Silverius for attempting to betray Rome to the Goths during the first siege. His overall historical grasp of the period seemed very impressive indeed.
Though Hughes's scholarship is not up to the level of Lord Mahon's encyclopedic 19th century standards, it is more than adequate to his purpose. He offers archaeological detail not available in Mahon's day, as well as a detailed look at the arms and armaments of the Persian, Vandalic, and Gothic antagonists of Belisarius. He does succumb to the modern tendency to disbelieve the numbers of troops given by the ancient historians and adjust them so that the victor is invariably shown to have an equal or greater number of troops on hand than the defeated party--a trend popularized by Hans Delbruck in the 19th century. Suffice it to say that I disagree strongly with this method of computation which is often done on the flimsiest of pretenses.
The book itself is an attractive artifact. The writing is good and the numerous illustrations are well placed and help bring the text to life. The inclusion of battle maps is a great boon and allows the reader to better visualize how the various actions developed. I felt that the work ended somewhat abruptly, and Hughes's cursory and dismissive treatment of the legend of the blind Belisarius begging for his bread was unwarranted, particularly considering the amount of effort his predecessor, Lord Mahon, took to prove the veracity of the legend.
Over all, I was well satisfied with this fair and even-handed treatment of Belisarius and recommend it to anyone interested in the man or his times. If this one piques your curiosity, you might also enjoy Lord Mahon's much denser Life of Belisarius , or the historical fiction biography of the general's early life, Belisarius: The First Shall Be Last . Or, you might just dive into the original histories written by Belisarius's secretary, Procopius, which make for great reading in their own right and are readily available in English translation. Start with History of the Wars, The Persian War and go on from there.
There are things the author does well. He does a fairly good job of chronicling campaigns and battles. Mr. Hughes does a very good job of explaining the differences in weapons and tactics between the "roman" forces and their opponents the Persians and the Germanic peoples. He makes the reader aware of the nature and biases of those who left written records of this time period. A careful reader will also get a sense of the ramshackle nature of the later Roman or Byzantine empire. It is a far cry from the Roman empire at its peak with disciplined, well organized and supplied armies of heavy infantry and instead consists of irregularly-paid levies of poorly motivated infantry, elite cavalry and mercenaries.
There were things the author did not do well. We learn very little about Belisarius the man. We read nothing about his early life, where he came from, the circumstances of his political marriage to Antonina and other things that give us insight into this man and the world he lived in. I feel the author did a poor job of making the story interesting. At various points, I dropped the book in favor of another and then came back to it. For me, that's a sign of what another reviewer referred to as "lackluster writing" and I agree with him.
As a biography, this book is very poor. As an effective (but, sometimes a tad dry) history of campaigns and battles, it does a fairly good job. It does a good job of looking at how the roman forces, as well as their opponents, were organized and equipped for battle.
On the whole, it's just okay and I give it three stars.
Top reviews from other countries
The author describes the life of Belisarius as bizantine general with much caution and partiality.His failures and successes are
shown in the same proportion ,giving credibility to this book.Highly recommended for those who are looking for more information about this
underrated general that achieved so many crucial victories on the battlefield that just his presence was enough to control the enemy.Respected by the enemies and feared by his countrymen.
What would be of the Empire (both sides) without such talented man commanding the army?