Kindle Price: | $8.99 |
Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Blitzkrieg Russia (Images of War) Kindle Edition
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPen & Sword Military
- Publication dateJuly 19, 2011
- File size4837 KB
- Hitler: A Life in Pictures: The Official Third Reich Publication (Images of War Special)Kindle Edition$2.99$2.99
- The Crushing of Army Group North 1944–1945 on the Eastern Front: Images of War SeriesKindle Edition$14.97$14.97
- Hitler versus Stalin: The Eastern Front 1944–1945 - Warsaw to Berlin (Images of War)Kindle Edition$14.97$14.97
- Chiang Kai-shek Versus Mao Tse-tung: The Battle for China, 1946–1949 (Images of War)Kindle Edition$11.99$11.99
- Battle of Midway: America's Decisive Strike in the Pacific in WWII (Images of War)Paperback$20.93$20.93
Editorial Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B0094JTPX6
- Publisher : Pen & Sword Military (July 19, 2011)
- Publication date : July 19, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 4837 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 156 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,294,531 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #402 in Military Pictorial History
- #614 in Conventional Weapons & Warfare History (Kindle Store)
- #1,812 in Military History Pictorials
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
of the pictures on the book as the text. The author(s) does not have knowledge of military history.
Probably don't know the difference between Wehrmacht Luftwaffe and Wehrmacht Heers.
One picture shown Soviet prisoners of war; I am certain they are not based on the uniform.
The photos are authentic though, I have seen quite a lot of old pictures at Berlin flea market.
Ed Loh
Huntington Township, NY
The presentation is good but I think that the editor can do a hardcover version, I always consult the book and they started to wrippoff.
Amazon UK says the book has 176 pages, but my copy has 144 pages, and of these the last ten are blank.
I'll start with the caption on page 17:
"This is a truly impressive line-up of SdKfzs sporting flak artillery pieces. The SdKfz was a hard-track military vehicle, which dates back to 1934 when designs were underway, leading to its first appearance in 1938. Aside from being a tractor for the 88mm Flak gun and howitzers, it was also widely used as a self-propelled anti-aircraft vehicle..."
Well, it's nonsense to describe an "SdKfz" without specifying which inventory number, and there is no such thing as a "hard-track military vehicle". It was the Sd.Kfz.7 which usually towed the 88mm Flak guns and which started to be produced in large numbers around 1938, but this picture is of the Sd.Kfz.6. Basically the whole paragraph is irrelevant rubbish.
Page 19 is just as bad. The caption tells us these are "German infantrymen", but the author hasn't realised that this entire chapter is actually photos of a Luftwaffe anti-aircraft unit. The soldiers in this black and white photo are almost certainly wearing the red Waffenfarbe of the Artillery, not the Infantry. The author describes the dress of soldiers of the Heer, however they are actually wearing what is commonly known as the 'Fliegerbluse' of the Luftwaffe. They are wearing blue-grey, not field-grey, and the collars are not "faced in a dark blue/green material" as we are told.
On page 24 the vehicle is a Krupp Protze, not a Horch Kfz.15
On page 28 the caption reads, "This is the classic German R12 motorcycle with sidecar" but it isn't an R12 in the picture; it's a BMW R75.
On page 39 the caption reads, "The German on the left of the photograph appears to be an officer, as he is carrying a map case around his neck." Actually it's just an ordinary soldier with a gas cape in an oblong pouch attached to his gas mask strap. This error is repeated on page 44.
On page 85 there is a picture of an armoured car with a big advertisement in the background saying, HUILES RENAULT. You have to wonder why they included this photo, because I doubt that it was taken in the Soviet Union!
Writing books about WWII would be a dream job for thousands of people, so why doesn't the publisher select someone who could do it better? It's a shame because I'd love to know more about these pictures.
The pictures come from Jim Payne, a photograph collector who has an interesting website called Through Their Eyes. The crashed Soviet plane on pages 58 and 59 of the book (wrongly identified by the authors) seems to be a Neman/Kharkov R-10, which is quite a rare machine. You can see one of these two photos on the website under the heading WW2 GERMAN ARMY RUSSIAN FRONT.
First off, I really enjoyed the rich variety of pix found in this 2011 Pen & Sword volume. The pix depict Russian and German tanks, armored cars, flak-guns, trucks, MGs and artillery pieces along with snaps of German infantrymen in various poses, Russian POWs, peasants and battle scenes. Taken together, the photographs really give a good picture of Russian Front warfare at the landser level. Then too, the photo quality is much better than many IOW volumes I've seen. It's a pity the authors - Sutherland and Canwell - did such a superficial job of captioning those gems.
In summary, enjoy the pix and wade through the captions. Recommended with reservations.
Top reviews from other countries
I started thumbing through (I have a habit of thumbing from the back forwards), Immediately I noticed the T-28 on page 130 mis-captioned as a T-35. The T-28 and -35 were nothing like each other. For a start there is a vast size difference; the -35 being nearly twice as long as the -28. Page 107 shows a knocked out Panzerkampfwagen III, which has been misidentified as a "KV-1." That's bad enough but the, for me, biggest stand out error appears on page 38. "A stricken and abandoned T-34/76.........." which is actually "A stricken and abandoned T-40........" Even more so when there's a photograph on the facing page, correctly captioned showing a T-34/76.
Again, the photograph on page 15. According to the caption, it is assumed that the photograph was taken during the opening stages of Barbarossa. Okay, the authors add a disclaimer by the word "assumption". It's a vague photograph but looking closely, the vehicles in the foreground are long barrel Pazerkampfwagen IV's (at least late model Ausf F's). These didn't enter service until 1942, which is after Barbarossa. The interesting point though is the tank on the horizon, second from the left. Silhouette wise, it looks distinctly like a Panzer VI Tiger I. I can also see what appear to be the two upright exhaust bins on the back. These didn't even arrive in Russia until the summer of 1942 at the earliest, but I'd date the shot at sometime around Operation Citadel. A photograph from the same group appears on the following page. Panzer IV's and two (at far right) which from their silhouettes appear to be Panzer VI's.
Page 24; captioned as a "Horch Kfz 15". It's a Krupp Protze. Page 28; captioned as a "BMW R12". It's a BMW r75. Page 35; KV-2 captioned as a "KB-2" (they've used the cyrillic form).
Again on page 78, a shot of a downed "DB3", which is actually an Il-2, and was taken after Barbarossa. Reason; the stars carry white outlines which didn't really come in until late 1942, although there were rare exceptions. Page 23; another "appears to be shot" of a T-34/76. It is a T-34/76. Pages 88 and 89 are definitely not Opel Blitz's. The vehicle on page 89 is a Büssing NAG. You can even see the prominent manufacturers stamp on the bumper above the licence plate.
Another niggle is the phrase "appears to show/be". This is very apparent with the caption on page 26; "A downed Russian aircraft, which appears to be a Tupolev SB." Not "appears to be". It IS a Tupolev SB. That strikes me that whoever captioned and/or researched the photographs has little idea of the subject they are trying to identify. The same happens on page 59 with a downed Soviet aircraft "appearing to be" an "Ilyushin Il-4". It is a Nieman R-10. The R-10 and the Il-4 were nothing like each other. The photograph on the facing page is of the same aircraft but from a frontal angle, yet is this time captioned as a Polikarpov I-16. Another "appears to be" shot on page 80 of a BT-7, which is a BT-7. Page 85 shows a photograph that was clearly taken in France (note the 'Renault' garage behind), but at least the subject is correctly captioned as a SdKfz232.
What I find interesting though, is that some of the photographs ARE correctly captioned. One example being page 54, and yes it IS a BA-20. So the authors have taken the trouble to research properly there, but why not the rest of the book? Had these been researched properly, it would have been a useful book. A quick look at the bibliography in the back of the book shows that the authors have consulted a mere eight books and although written by trusted authors, some of those have now been surpassed by new information.
I don't wish to come across as an anorak, and I didn't want to go into a long diatribe about the shortcomings of the book, but I take this sort of thing quite seriously. If I buy a book for research purposes, I need to know that it contains accurate information. Okay, nobody is infallible and one or two errors can and do creep in, but the book has them front to back. The misidentification to those 'in the know' is irritating, but it is purely misleading to those not familiar with the subject. Thankfully, I did not pay full whack for the book. Had I done so, I would have been less happy. Perhaps an addendum in the back of the book would have helped.
On the plus side: interesting photographs. A big minus side: my advice to the reader would be if you know the subject, to take the captions with a big pinch of salt. Two stars only for the photographic content; I could award more there, but I'd be misleadingly giving this book a high rating.
Amazon UK says the book has 176 pages, but my copy has 144 pages, and of these the last ten are blank.
I'll start with the caption on page 17:
"This is a truly impressive line-up of SdKfzs sporting flak artillery pieces. The SdKfz was a hard-track military vehicle, which dates back to 1934 when designs were underway, leading to its first appearance in 1938. Aside from being a tractor for the 88mm Flak gun and howitzers, it was also widely used as a self-propelled anti-aircraft vehicle..."
Well, it's nonsense to describe an "SdKfz" without specifying which inventory number, and there is no such thing as a "hard-track military vehicle". It's "halftrack" of course, but which halftrack are they talking about? Because it was the Sd.Kfz.7 which usually towed the 88mm Flak guns and which started to be produced in large numbers around 1938, while the picture on this page is of the Sd.Kfz.6. Basically the whole paragraph is irrelevant rubbish.
Page 19 is just as bad. The caption tells us these are "German infantrymen", but the author hasn't realised that this entire chapter is actually photos of a Luftwaffe anti-aircraft unit. The soldiers in this black and white photo are almost certainly wearing the red Waffenfarbe of the Artillery, not the Infantry. The author describes the dress of soldiers of the Heer, however they are actually wearing what is commonly known as the 'Fliegerbluse' of the Luftwaffe. They are wearing blue-grey, not field-grey, and the collars are not "faced in a dark blue/green material" as we are told.
On page 24 the vehicle is a Krupp Protze, not a Horch Kfz.15
On page 28 the caption reads, "This is the classic German R12 motorcycle with sidecar" but it isn't an R12 in the picture; it's a BMW R75.
On page 39 the caption reads, "The German on the left of the photograph appears to be an officer, as he is carrying a map case around his neck." Actually it's just an ordinary soldier with a gas cape in an oblong pouch attached to his gas mask strap. This error is repeated on page 44.
On page 85 there is a picture of an armoured car with a big advertisement in the background saying, HUILES RENAULT. You have to wonder why they included this photo, because I doubt that it was taken in the Soviet Union!
Writing books about WWII would be a dream job for thousands of people, so why doesn't the publisher select someone who could do it better? It's a shame because I'd love to know more about these pictures.
The pictures come from Jim Payne, a photograph collector who has an interesting website called Through Their Eyes. The crashed Soviet plane on pages 58 and 59 of the book (wrongly identified by the authors) seems to be a Neman/Kharkov R-10, which is quite a rare machine. You can see one of these two photos on the website under the heading WW2 GERMAN ARMY RUSSIAN FRONT.
Then the real howler - page 107; 'this photograph appears to show a completely wrecked Russian KV1 tank'. No, it clearly show a wrecked German Panzer III, totally different to a KV-1. The shape of the front hull, narrowness of the tracks and the open escape hatch in the side of the hull kind of give it away!
A shame really, as I would have graded it higher if a little more care had been taken.