These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Seeing Is Believing: How Hollywood Taught Us to Stop Worrying and Love the Fifties Kindle Edition
Seeing is Believing is a provocative, shrewd, witty look at the Hollywood fifties movies we all love-or love to hate-and the thousand subtle ways they reflect the political tensions of the decade. Peter Biskind, former executive editor of Premiere, is one of our most astute cultural critics. Here he concentrates on the films everybody saw but nobody really looked at--classics like Giant, On the Waterfront, Rebel Without a Cause, and Invasion of the Body Snatchers--and shows us how movies that appear to be politically innocent in fact carry an ideological burden. As we see organization men and rugged individualists, housewives and career women, cops and doctors, teen angels and teenage werewolves fight it out across the screen from suburbia to the farthest reaches of the cosmos, we understand that we have been watching one long dispute about how to be a man, a woman, an American--the conflicts of the period in action.
A work of brilliant analysis and meticulous conception, Seeing Is Believing offers fascinating insights into how to read films of any era.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
"A brilliant and imaginative analysis of the political and sexual crosscurrents of the fifties in the movies."--Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Blood Rites
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B009HT7MII
- Publisher : Holt Paperbacks (August 6, 2024)
- Publication date : August 6, 2024
- Language : English
- File size : 6.9 MB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 514 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,066,677 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #839 in Movie & Video History & Criticism
- #2,997 in Movie History & Criticism
- #4,867 in Popular Culture in Social Sciences
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Peter Biskind is the author of five previous books, including Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock 'n' Roll Generation Saved Hollywood. He is a contributor to Vanity Fair and was formerly the executive editor of Premiere magazine. He lives with his family in Columbia County, New York.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find the book engaging and entertaining, with one noting it's well worth the time for film genre scholars. They appreciate the movie history content, with one review highlighting its academic approach to 1950s cinema. The book's pacing receives positive feedback, with one customer describing it as very smart.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Select to learn more
Customers find the book engaging and entertaining, with one noting how it keeps the story flowing.
"...case I always found his discussions and analyses to be interesting, engaging, and entertaining...." Read more
"...Seeing is Believing is a significant work and well worth the time of film genre scholars." Read more
"...It is a perfect book to read in the era of streaming movies, because Biskind goes much deeper than the the surface and references many films that..." Read more
"Biskind writes about Hollywood like a great screenwriter - keeping the story flowing and building on the insider excitement - at least he does in..." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's exploration of 1950s cinema, with one customer highlighting its academic approach and another noting its comprehensive list of films.
"...because Biskind goes much deeper than the the surface and references many films that younger readers are likely to have missed...." Read more
"...That said, it did give me a neat list of 50s films to add to my list." Read more
"Thoughtful and entertaining analyses of 1950s movies..." Read more
"Enjoying the background on various movies..." Read more
Customers appreciate the book's pacing, with one noting its interesting analyses and another describing it as a significant work.
"...for me, and in any case I always found his discussions and analyses to be interesting, engaging, and entertaining...." Read more
"...Seeing is Believing is a significant work and well worth the time of film genre scholars." Read more
"A Very Smart, Academic Look at Fifties Movies..." Read more
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 11, 2015I thoroughly enjoyed this book. In it, Peter Biskind examines a host of films from the fifties (and a few from surrounding years), putting them onto the sociological equivalent of an analyst's couch, so to speak. Through the aperture of these movies, all the conflicting social forces that were vying with one another in the U.S. during 1950s can be seen at work: Liberalism versus conservatism, individualism and personal freedom versus community and conformism, expanding opportunities for women versus reactionary antifeminist backlash, and lots more.
For the most part Biskind presents a convincing case that the movies he looks at stake out this or that position on this or that spectrum of conflicting social opinions and trends, but I'm certainly not saying that I agreed with all of his points. A thinking, critical reader is always unlikely to agree with everything they find in an opinion-packed, interpretation-packed book like this one. In particular, I was profoundly unconvinced by Biskind's argument that the 1954 giant-ant movie Them! carried an anti-feminist subtext. But disagreements like this were the exception rather than the rule for me, and in any case I always found his discussions and analyses to be interesting, engaging, and entertaining.
As an example, here's a passage I particularly enjoyed from a section on the James Dean vehicle Rebel Without a Cause (1955): "With its trilogy of sick families, Rebel touches all the bases. Parents are criticized for being too strong and too weak, too authoritarian and too permissive, for being absent when the kids need them and smothering them with affection when they don’t. If it’s bad to treat teen-agers like children, it’s also bad to treat them like adults. In Rebel, parents can’t do anything right."
Quite a bit of the book is devoted to examining gender roles -- how views about these roles were changing during the 50s, and how a range of movies portrayed and commented, either positively or negatively, on this change. The book's evisceration of the savagely anti-feminist Mildred Pierce (1945) was a particular delight for me in the text.
So again, this is a deeply interesting, engaging, and entertaining book!
- Reviewed in the United States on August 3, 2017While but a segment of his book, Biskind's discussion of 1950s SF has become foundational, whether or not scholars agree with his assertions. More often disagreed with, Biskind's analysis of 1950s film history nonetheless serves as far more than a straw man. Seeing is Believing is a significant work and well worth the time of film genre scholars.
- Reviewed in the United States on March 24, 2013This is a fascinating, deep dive in the cinema of the 1950s. It is a perfect book to read in the era of streaming movies, because Biskind goes much deeper than the the surface and references many films that younger readers are likely to have missed. I would finish a chapter and set the book aside to stream a film (or two) and then resume reading. It made for a long, but worthwhile read. I feel like I know a lot more about pop culture in the middle of the past century than I did.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 13, 2022If you like to consider the social environment of old films, you will probably like this book. I am enjoying it.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 26, 2023Book arrived on time and in very good condition.
- Reviewed in the United States on December 14, 2009I am a big fan of Peter Biskind's Easy Riders, Raging Bulls. That book tells a story of the evolution of film in the 60s and the 70s and who contributed to those changes. Unfortunately, Seeing is Believing tells us less about the evolution of film through the 50s and how it evolved and digs much deeper into more academic film criticism. As Biskind writes in the introduction, "my concern is not so much with the intentions of the filmmakers as with the outcome of the filmmaking process." I interpret this phrase to mean that Biskind is writing about what he sees in the movies, not what the filmmaker intended or what others might see.
Biskind goes from genre to genre and applies the films he reviews to specific liberal and conservative ideological positions he has identified. As he does so, the occasional anecdote about a film is mentioned, but only fleetingly. For example, some movies had their endings changed by the studios. I was interested in hearing more about the changed endings, why they were changed, and what directors fought the changes, then Biskind's discussion of how the ending fits into his ideological spectrum.
One thing that really bothered me was that in discussing The Court Martial of Billy Mitchell, Biskind ignored that the movie was based on true events of the 1920s and was not an entirely Hollywood creation. In excluding that information, Biskind betrays the problem of ignoring the filmmakers in telling us what the film means. Of course, Billy Mitchell can still fit into an interesting ideological discussion of the 1950s. Gary Cooper's decision to play him fits into a broader pattern of playing individualists and why the movie was made when it was could have some relevance. But Biskind does not discuss that context and instead focuses on the ideological categories he has conjured up.
If you liked Easy Riders, Raging Bulls and thought you would check out Biskind's other work, I would save this for last or skip it all together. That said, it did give me a neat list of 50s films to add to my list.
- Reviewed in the United States on April 4, 2009Biskind writes about Hollywood like a great screenwriter - keeping the story flowing and building on the insider excitement - at least he does in Easy Riders to Raging Bulls. and Down and Dirty Pictures. Seeing is believing is more of an intellectual dissection of 50's politics with movies as the lab animal. It's fascinating, but not nearly as fun.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 11, 2016The item arrived in a timely manner and as described.
Top reviews from other countries
-
LauraReviewed in Spain on July 17, 2016
5.0 out of 5 stars Para una buena lectura
El libro cumple las exectativas. Ya había leido varios del mismo autor, y este no desmerece, si te gusta el cine y un buen análisis del mismo.
- Peggy OldfieldReviewed in Canada on February 14, 2021
2.0 out of 5 stars Spare Us The Deep Analysis !
Any book in which the author spends most of his time showing off his deep intellect is a book which gets very tiresome very quickly. Author Peter Biskind goes on for chapter after chapter discussing whether the films of the 1950's were populist or pluralist in content and what psychological effect they had on their audiences. There were some very interesting films made in the 1950's which reflected on the aftermath of World War Two, changing morals, teenage rebellion and the breakdown in authority. However, author Biskind seems to ignore the effect that these films had on ordinary audiences and instead, dissects them as he looks for hidden meanings in every other scene. Most movie-goers of that era either liked or disliked a film and did not wonder what the Freudian implications of the plot might have been.