Learn more
These promotions will be applied to this item:
Some promotions may be combined; others are not eligible to be combined with other offers. For details, please see the Terms & Conditions associated with these promotions.
- Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
- In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies Enlarged Edition, Kindle Edition
- ISBN-13978-0226345703
- EditionEnlarged
- PublisherThe University of Chicago Press
- Publication dateFebruary 12, 2016
- LanguageEnglish
- File size831 KB
Kindle E-Readers
- Kindle Paperwhite
- Kindle Oasis
- Kindle Oasis (9th Generation)
- Kindle (10th Generation)
- Kindle Scribe, 1st generation (2024 release)
- Kindle Paperwhite (10th Generation)
- All New Kindle E-reader (11th Generation)
- Kindle Paperwhite (5th Generation)
- Kindle Oasis (10th Generation)
- Kindle Touch
- Kindle Paperwhite (11th Generation)
- All New Kindle E-reader
- Kindle
- Kindle Scribe (1st Generation)
- Kindle Voyage
- All new Kindle paperwhite
- Kindle Paperwhite (12th Generation)
Fire Tablets
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Anderson’s survey of a large swathe of Marx’s writings illustrates the volution of Marx’s thinking and the breadth of vision. This is major work which will influence debate and thinking for a long time to come.”
-- Barry Healy ― Marx & Philosophy Review of Books"Marxist scholar Kevin Anderson has undertaken an exhaustive reading of some of Marx's lesser-known writings. He explores how Marx developed and changed his ideas about societies that, in the 19th century, were still peripheral to capitalism. . . . This whole book is fascinating." -- Colin Barker ― Socialist Review
“Anderson may just have provided the burgeoning Marx industry with another major focus for its research and debates. Marx at the Margins reveals a dimension of Marx that is very little known and even less understood. Anderson makes an overwhelming case for the importance of Marx’s views on non-Western societies, ethnicity, nationalism, and race to our interpretations of his thinking over a wide range of topics. This is an incredibly innovative, interesting, and terribly important book that will greatly benefit any of its readers.” -- Bertell Ollman, New York University
“Marx at the Margins is a book of tremendous scope, filled with important scholarly contributions, including Anderson’s highly original reading of Marx’s theory of history. In this truly ground-breaking work, Kevin Anderson analyzes Marx’s journalism and various unpublished writings on European colonialism and the developing countries for the first time, breaking the long-held stereotype that Marx was an incorrigible class and economic reductionist. Well-written in clear and accessible prose, Marx at the Margins proves that Marx is the sophisticated and original theorist of history some might not have ever expected him to be.” -- Douglas Kellner, University of California, Los Angeles
“Marx at the Margins is essential reading for anyone seeking to explore the sophistication and complexity of Marx and Engels’s writings on race, nationalism, ethnicity, and the historical development of non-Western societies.”
-- Nagesh Rao ― International Socialist ReviewAbout the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B01BWMDZQU
- Publisher : The University of Chicago Press; Enlarged edition (February 12, 2016)
- Publication date : February 12, 2016
- Language : English
- File size : 831 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Print length : 333 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #564,921 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #259 in Communism & Socialism (Kindle Store)
- #801 in Political History (Kindle Store)
- #907 in Federal Government
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star5 star86%7%7%0%0%86%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star4 star86%7%7%0%0%7%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star3 star86%7%7%0%0%7%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star2 star86%7%7%0%0%0%
- 5 star4 star3 star2 star1 star1 star86%7%7%0%0%0%
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonTop reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2019This book culls the notes, letters, and uncollected articles of Marx to provide a view of Marx that is only hinted at in his canon. Although it is possible that a devotée of Marx will be able to ignore or rationalize Marx no matter what they read herein, for others it merely confirms the suspicions formed when reading Marx's most notable works. This should be indispensable for Marxists and naysayers alike.
- Reviewed in the United States on July 30, 2019good book
- Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2015Brings many recontextualizing fragments together to alter the received dogma of what Marx means to us today.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 16, 2017OK
- Reviewed in the United States on August 27, 2014Very good book and informative.
- Reviewed in the United States on October 19, 2010Kevin Anderson does a wonderful job exploring Marx's work on the "Margins" of the industrial world. So often times pondered by students of the twentieth century as to why the Bolshevik revolution, a revolution Marxist in character, took place in the most backward of European countries finds traction within Anderson's insight. His treatment of Marx's writing on india also prove interesting.
- Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2010"Marx at the Margins" is a title supposed to work two ways. It is a substantial analysis and review of Marx's writings, familiar and yet unpublished, about nations and races, but it is also an attempt to revive parts of Marx's analysis which are often seen as marginal or irrelevant to his overall thought, but which author Kevin B. Anderson argues actually were a very central concern of his. Since Anderson is working on a forthcoming scientific publication of Marx's "ethnological notebooks", which have never yet been published in full in any language, he is in a good position to expand on the nature and background of Marx's writings on non-Western nations and their histories. Additionally, the book covers the way in which Marx discussed the intersection between race and class, notably in the case of his journalism on the American Civil War but also in the context of Ireland (as the Irish were effectively not considered 'white').
Anderson traces the way in which themes of alternative routes to development, anti-colonial resistance and the negative results of imperialism on the workers of the imperial country became increasingly important in Marx's writings over time. Much has been written about the (in)famous writings of Marx and Engels on the colonies and 'lesser nations' in the 1840s and 1850s, in particular Marx's journalism on India, but Anderson emphasizes how this was only their viewpoint during this period and how they became ever more critical of imperialism and ever less convinced of capitalism's progressive power outside the Western world as time went on. This has been pointed out by various commentators on Marx already, but given the pervasive influence of the Communist Manifesto and the 1850s journalism on the way Marx and Engels are perceived as always seeing imperialism as progressive historically (while always recognizing its massive damage), it can't hurt to underline this again. Anderson also goes into more detail into the writings on the American Civil War, which are interesting and somewhat overlooked; important is the way Marx sees the position of the 'poor whites' as being maintained artificially by holding down the blacks, and notes the impossibility thereby of the 'poor whites' emancipating themselves on the basis of oppressing another. He compares it to the position of the plebeians in Rome.
Unfortunately, here as elsewhere Anderson makes a ridiculous amount of 'hineininterpretierung' about the supposed major differences between Marx and Engels, since he follows Dunayevskaya's school of interpretation on this point. In fact, as has been pointed out by many critics such as the excellent J.D. Hunley, there are no significant differences of opinion between Marx and Engels, although being different people they certainly had differences of style and emphasis. It is absurd, as Anderson does, to demand that when Engels for example writes that Marx was planning to write a book on Morgan's anthropology (like he ended up doing himself eventually), Engels should provide evidence for this! The two gentlemen saw each other literally every day once Engels moved to London, and discussed their views in depth; if there were any major differences in viewpoint one would surely think they would have noticed! Moreover, Anderson like many other critics of Engels are perfectly happy to believe him at his word when he graciously gives Marx more credit than he deserved, such as when he claimed Marx really wrote most of the Manifesto - Anderson approvingly quotes this, while in fact we know that the Manifesto was based itself on a major draft along the same themes, one that Engels had written. This ridiculous idea of "Marx's Marxism" versus "Engels' Marxism", where anyone can take aspects of Marxist writing they don't like and shove the blame off onto poor Engels, really needs to go away.
That said, Anderson has much interesting to say about the way in which Marx (and Engels) shifted position throughout their writings, from a viewpoint of capitalism as highly murderous but still basically progressive, and thereby imperialism also, to a severe skepticism about the progressive potential of either and an increasing belief in the possibility of multilinear development. It is important to point out that Anderson describes their way of thinking here, and points to many interesting notes and commentaries that are not yet known even to most scholars of their writing, but that he does not defend the correctness of Marx's thought on these topics as such. This is good, because while Anderson makes an intriguing case for seeing the 'Asiatic mode of production' in the late Marx as a concept of multilinear development rather than one of stasis, we know that Marx and Engels got much of the basic empirical patterns of Asian history in particularly entirely wrong. Moreover, even if in their time a door was still open to socialism on the basis of pre-capitalist patterns, surely such is no longer possible today, when capitalist relations have pervaded virtually every nook and cranny of the world's production. In that sense, we may actually be closer to the situation described in their early writings than in their later one. But Marx and Engels' writings on subjects as nation, race, and gender are indeed important and Anderson is surely right in emphasizing what a central role they came to play in their thought. This is all the more significant because of the persistent power of these categories today, as well as the debate on imperialism vs nationalism in left-wing thought. This book is therefore important reading for anyone interested in Marxism.
Top reviews from other countries
- M. A. KrulReviewed in the United Kingdom on November 3, 2010
4.0 out of 5 stars Marx on nations, races, and development
"Marx at the Margins" is a title supposed to work two ways. It is a substantial analysis and review of Marx's writings, familiar and yet unpublished, about nations and races, but it is also an attempt to revive parts of Marx's analysis which are often seen as marginal or irrelevant to his overall thought, but which author Kevin B. Anderson argues actually were a very central concern of his. Since Anderson is working on a forthcoming scientific publication of Marx's "ethnological notebooks", which have never yet been published in full in any language, he is in a good position to expand on the nature and background of Marx's writings on non-Western nations and their histories. Additionally, the book covers the way in which Marx discussed the intersection between race and class, notably in the case of his journalism on the American Civil War but also in the context of Ireland (as the Irish were effectively not considered 'white').
Anderson traces the way in which themes of alternative routes to development, anti-colonial resistance and the negative results of imperialism on the workers of the imperial country became increasingly important in Marx's writings over time. Much has been written about the (in)famous writings of Marx and Engels on the colonies and 'lesser nations' in the 1840s and 1850s, in particular Marx's journalism on India, but Anderson emphasizes how this was only their viewpoint during this period and how they became ever more critical of imperialism and ever less convinced of capitalism's progressive power outside the Western world as time went on. This has been pointed out by various commentators on Marx already, but given the pervasive influence of the Communist Manifesto and the 1850s journalism on the way Marx and Engels are perceived as always seeing imperialism as progressive historically (while always recognizing its massive damage), it can't hurt to underline this again. Anderson also goes into more detail into the writings on the American Civil War, which are interesting and somewhat overlooked; important is the way Marx sees the position of the 'poor whites' as being maintained artificially by holding down the blacks, and notes the impossibility thereby of the 'poor whites' emancipating themselves on the basis of oppressing another. He compares it to the position of the plebeians in Rome.
Unfortunately, here as elsewhere Anderson makes a ridiculous amount of 'hineininterpretierung' about the supposed major differences between Marx and Engels, since he follows Dunayevskaya's school of interpretation on this point. In fact, as has been pointed out by many critics such as the excellent J.D. Hunley, there are no significant differences of opinion between Marx and Engels, although being different people they certainly had differences of style and emphasis. It is absurd, as Anderson does, to demand that when Engels for example writes that Marx was planning to write a book on Morgan's anthropology (like he ended up doing himself eventually), Engels should provide evidence for this! The two gentlemen saw each other literally every day once Engels moved to London, and discussed their views in depth; if there were any major differences in viewpoint one would surely think they would have noticed! Moreover, Anderson like many other critics of Engels are perfectly happy to believe him at his word when he graciously gives Marx more credit than he deserved, such as when he claimed Marx really wrote most of the Manifesto - Anderson approvingly quotes this, while in fact we know that the Manifesto was based itself on a major draft along the same themes, one that Engels had written. This ridiculous idea of "Marx's Marxism" versus "Engels' Marxism", where anyone can take aspects of Marxist writing they don't like and shove the blame off onto poor Engels, really needs to go away.
That said, Anderson has much interesting to say about the way in which Marx (and Engels) shifted position throughout their writings, from a viewpoint of capitalism as highly murderous but still basically progressive, and thereby imperialism also, to a severe skepticism about the progressive potential of either and an increasing belief in the possibility of multilinear development. It is important to point out that Anderson describes their way of thinking here, and points to many interesting notes and commentaries that are not yet known even to most scholars of their writing, but that he does not defend the correctness of Marx's thought on these topics as such. This is good, because while Anderson makes an intriguing case for seeing the 'Asiatic mode of production' in the late Marx as a concept of multilinear development rather than one of stasis, we know that Marx and Engels got much of the basic empirical patterns of Asian history in particularly entirely wrong. Moreover, even if in their time a door was still open to socialism on the basis of pre-capitalist patterns, surely such is no longer possible today, when capitalist relations have pervaded virtually every nook and cranny of the world's production. In that sense, we may actually be closer to the situation described in their early writings than in their later one. But Marx and Engels' writings on subjects as nation, race, and gender are indeed important and Anderson is surely right in emphasizing what a central role they came to play in their thought. This is all the more significant because of the persistent power of these categories today, as well as the debate on imperialism vs nationalism in left-wing thought. This book is therefore important reading for anyone interested in Marxism.