Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The Battle for New York: The City at the Heart of the American Revolution Paperback – October 28, 2003
- Print length464 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPenguin Books
- Publication dateOctober 28, 2003
- Reading age18 years and up
- Dimensions6.08 x 1.03 x 9.16 inches
- ISBN-100142003336
- ISBN-13978-0142003336
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
Review
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Penguin Books; Reissue edition (October 28, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 464 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0142003336
- ISBN-13 : 978-0142003336
- Reading age : 18 years and up
- Item Weight : 1.12 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.08 x 1.03 x 9.16 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,599,614 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,393 in U.S. Revolution & Founding History
- #29,753 in U.S. State & Local History
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Too much had happened in New York to dismiss its role immediately before, during, and after the war. One example: the Battle of Golden Hill (at the present John Street) in which British troops attacked American patriots occurred more than a month before the Boston Massacre, which has been long regarded as the first skirmish between colonists and the Crown. Mr. Schecter appropriately emphasizes the Battle of Brooklyn (or the Battle of Long Island) and how Washington's strategic (and lucky) evacuation across the East River and through Manhattan turned the tide of the war: the war could've been over then and there had Washington's army been captured. There are more stories, there is more evidence of the critical role New York played during the nascent years of the United States, and, Mr. Schecter has wonderfully captured this undeniable fact.
For a complete understanding of New York's role in this conflict, I recommend reading: "Divided Loyalties" by Richard Ketchum, which presents the political and social tensions of the city in the years before the Revolution; "The Battle of Brooklyn" by John Gallagher for a detailed examination of the weeks before, during and after this first large-scale confrontation between the British and Americans; and then Schecter's book--IN THAT ORDER. Each book picks up where the previous one had left off. There are other good books about New York's involvement in the Revolution, but these three can give you as close to a complete understanding of it as possible.
"The Battle for New York: The City at the Heart of the American Revolution" is one of those books that fulfills a large gap in our complete understanding of that war and that era in history.
For that reason, Mr. Schecter is to be thanked for his contribution.
The author does a nice job of linking current locations to where they were then. For those not familier with the city today this might be confusing, but it is interesting none the less. Barnet Schacter has given us a social, political and part military history on the subject. The beginning is slow to get off the mark with the details of pre-Revolutionary politics in the city a bit hard to grasp. The various personalities involved, and their political antics makes for slow reading at first, but the reader is rewarded if he/she is persistent.
The book naturally picks up once the British fleet arrives in New York Harbor. Schacter is good at pointing out the local details of where the British landed and how they marched in Brooklyn. He is weaker on some of his battle details at times. The Battle of Long Island, or Brooklyn as it is often called gets cursory treatment. Of course there is not much to tell as the Americans mostly ran from British bayonets. The one thing that sticks out from this narrative is how the British under Howe allowed the Americans to escape from almost every encounter. From Brooklyn to White Plains Howe's leisurely campaign proceeds at a processional pace, allowing Washington to pick up the pieces each time to make another stand. The British could have easily crushed Washy several times at New York, as the city was virtually impossible to defend with the resources at hand. Why they didn't remains somewhat of a mystery, although the reasons are there. Howe was politically against the war, had no stomach for crushing the Americans whom he basically liked; and he wanted to accomplish his objectives with as little bloodshed as possible. When one considers these aspects his campaign in and around New York becomes easier to understand. Howe wanted to show the Americans the futility of their efforts and was hoping for their reconciliation with Britain. Unfortunately for Howe and co. this was wishful thinking. The British would never again have such a series of opportunities to bag Washy and the main rebel army. Henry Clinton knew this could not be done, and the account provided of his fustrations over Howe's management of the campaign is compelling.
Like most historians on the Revolution, Schacter is more a story teller than a pure military historian. He provides just enough detail to satisfy the general reader, and to frustrate the military reader! One of the points made often in the book on the battles around New York is that British casualties were higher in terms of killed and wounded than rebel. This is true, but the author leaves out the circumstances involved. In alomst all the engagements involved the Americans were fighting on the defense, often with some kind of protective cover, while the British were attacking out in the open. Its easy to see why British losses were higher in this regard. Americans fought well until their line was broken, then they ran or surrendered. This accounts for why most rebel losses were captives. I think Schacter exaggerates the losses sustained by the Britsih at Pells Point, and tends to show his pro-American bias rather blantly at times. This is understandable because most books written on the Revolution are done by American authors who always get carried away with the spirit of '76 syndrome. Where the book is strong is showing how the British capture of New York limited their strategy for the war overall. The harbor's use was limited due to a large sandbar that prevented ships from corssing at low tides.
There can be little doubt that British fixation on New York certainly contributed to their demise. Once Schacter finishes with the immediate action around the city in 1776 he provides an over-view of the war showing how New York influenced the course of the conflict. This in my opinion is one of the main strengths of the book. Readers will like some of the period detail, and the narrative is livened with many first-hand accounts from participants on both sides. The plight of the loyalists in the city makes for interesting reading as their story is often too little told. Details about how corrupt and inefficient the British occupation was provides insights into how garrisoning it was such a drag on their strategy. In the main a good book filled with many interesting details, if slightly weak on the battles in and around the city itself. Worthwhile.