Print List Price: | $24.00 |
Kindle Price: | $10.99 Save $13.01 (54%) |
Sold by: | Random House LLC Price set by seller. |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Coleridge: Early Visions, 1772-1804 Kindle Edition
BONUS MATERIAL: This ebook edition includes an excerpt from Richard Holmes's Falling Upwards.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherPantheon
- Publication dateJanuary 26, 2011
- File size6817 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright 1999 Reed Business Information, Inc.
From Library Journal
- Robert E. Brown, Onondaga Cty. P.L., Syracuse, N.Y.
Copyright 1990 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Review
--Francis King, Evening Standard (London)
"The best literary biography since Ellmann's Oscar Wilde."
--John Mortimer, Sunday Times (London)
"Dazzling. . . . Here is Coleridge, attractive and repellant, with all his seductive contradictions: the young man with his mountainous aspirations, his dreaminess . . . yammering poetry, pounding the turnpikes, dominating drawing-rooms; the foaming genius, messy with metaphysical secretions and uncontrollable speculations. Holmes has not merely reinterpreted Coleridge, he has re-created him, and his biography has the aura of fiction, the shimmer of an authentic portrait. [This is] a biography like few I have ever read."
--James Wood, The Guardian (London)
From the Trade Paperback edition.
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
CHILD OF NATURE
Coleridge was always fascinated by anything that promised poetical marvels or metaphysical peculiarities. The subject of his own childhood was no exception. “Before I was eight years old,” he used to begin in his hypnotic manner, “I was a character—sensibility, imagination, vanity, sloth . . . were even then prominent & manifest.” And then, like the Ancient Mariner, there was no stopping him.
2
In later life he talked of boyhood and schooldays with many of his closest friends, and wrote vividly about it in his poetry, his letters, his Biographia, and his private Notebooks. In all these records, a rich mixture of tragi-comedy, he developed the self-portrait of a precocious, highly imaginative child, driven into “exile” in the world, before he was emotionally prepared for its rigours, by the early death of his father. Cut off from the universe of nature and family affections, he saw himself as an exceptional creature, both intellectually brilliant and morally unstable. He was to make it one of the archetypes of Romantic childhood. This is the picture he presented to his brother George, a sober clergyman, in a poem written at the age of twenty-five:
Me from the spot where first I sprang to light
Too soon transplanted, ere my soul had fix’d
Its first domestic loves; and hence through life
Chasing chance-started friendships.
Thirty years later, at the age of fifty-five, talking to his physician and confidant, the surgeon James Gillman, he expressed the same feelings, though now raised into the sonorous prose of his late manner. “When I was first plucked up and transplanted from my birthplace and family, at the death of my dear father, whose revered image has ever survived in my mind . . . Providence (it has often occurred to me) gave the first intimation, that it was my lot, and that it was best for me, to make or find my way of life a detached individual, a Terrae Filius . . .” He was to be a solitary voyager, an archetypal “son of the Earth”, an orphan of the storm, flung out to wander over the world in search of visions. Or so, most wonderfully, he said.
3
Samuel Taylor Coleridge first “sprang to light” in the vicarage of the small market-town of Ottery St Mary in Devon, one autumn morning on 21 October 1772. He was the youngest often children, an unexpected fruit of late vintage; his father, the vicar, was already fifty-three years old and his mother forty-five. They both adored him—a large, fat, greedy baby with a shock of unruly black hair, and huge grey astonishing eyes. “My Father was very fond of me, and I was my mother’s darling—in consequence, I was very miserable.”
He was christened after his godfather, a local worthy, Mr Samuel Taylor, and always known in the family as “Sam”, a name he grew to dislike with poignant intensity. Like many a youngest child he was petted and indulged, and almost his earliest memory was of being specially carried out by his nurse to hear a strolling musician playing ballads in the moonlight, during the harvest festivities.
To hear our old Musician, blind and grey,
(Whom stretching from my nurse’s arms I kissed,)
His Scottish tunes and warlike marches play,
By moonshine, on the balmy summer-night . . .
Nursery tradition told of his waywardness and inquisitive mischief. When “carelessly” left by his nurse, he crawled to the fire and pulled out a live coal, badly burning his hand; a Promethean incident also fondly recalled in his poem “To an Infant” (1795). When, at the age of two, he came to be inoculated, he howled when the doctors tried to cover his eyes. It was not the pain, but the concealment of the mystery which upset him. “I manifested so much obstinate indignation, that at last they removed the bandage—and unaffrighted I looked at the lancet &suffered the scratch.” He was to do something like that for the rest of his life.
4
The large West Country family in which he grew up was in many ways a remarkable one. Eight of them were boys (one died in infancy), and all showed talent either for soldiering or scholarship. Their father, the Reverend John Coleridge, was not only’ vicar of Ottery, but also headmaster of the local King’s Grammar School, a man who inspired them with notions of duty and excellence which had a profound effect on their upbringing. He referred to them, with Old Testament pride, as his “tribe”. All the boys were securely launched in their careers at the time of his sudden death in 1781, except for little Sam who was not quite nine. The effects of this early bereavement were to run very deep for the youngest child.
In origin the Coleridges were a stalwart and undistinguished Devon clan ofyeoman farmers and small traders, from three parishes west of Exeter, which themselves sound like some sort of folksong Dunsford, Drewsteignton, and Doddiscombsleigh. If they were renowned for anything, it was for fertility. Coleridge used to say that his grandfather was a bastard brought up by the parish, and apprenticed as a woollen-draper in Crediton, where he only briefly deviated into respectability. If there was ever a sans-culotte revolution, he could safely deny “one drop of Gentility”?
Another tale he told, emphasised eccentricity. “His grandfather, a weaver, half-poet and half-madman . . . used to ask the passing beggar to dinner in Oriental phrase, ‘Will my lord turn in hither, and eat with his servant?’—and washed his feet.”
Nevertheless, his father, the Reverend John Coleridge, was an example of the historic rise of an English middle-class family in three generations; and his grandchildren were to be a successful race of judges, bishops, and senior academics. This pressure for family success, closely associated with Sam’s elder brothers, was to have a subtle and pervasive influence throughout Coleridge’s literary life—a profession where “success” and respectability are delusive concepts.
The Reverend John Coleridge was born in Crediton, north of Exeter, in January 1719. He obtained an exhibition to the local grammar school, and would have gone on directly to university but for the bankruptcy of his father, the woollen-draper. The reasons for this downfall are unknown, but there is some suggestion of heavy drinking, which can often be a family inheritance. Coleridge liked to believe that John was a dreamy and unworldly man—“a perfect Parson Adams” in an oft-repeated phrase—and would tell comic anecdotes of his father’s scholarly distraction, in long evening sessions with Gillman at Highgate, “till the tears ran down his face”. This may have been so in later life, but there is a characteristic element of myth-making in Coleridge’s accounts of John’s saintly simplicities. As a young man he seems to have been determined and ambitious, riding rough-shod over his various setbacks. Temporarily cheated of university, he took a schoolmastership at the nearby village of Clysthdon, married a local Crediton girl, by whom he had four daughters, and continued to study hard and somehow to save money. In 1747, at the age of twenty-eight, he was able to apply for matriculation as a mature student at Sidney Sussex, Cambridge—a triumph over his straitened circumstances.
Here he proved himself a brilliant student of classics and Hebrew, # so that by 1749 he had qualified for his first major appointment as headmaster of Squire’s Latin School at South Molton, and also obtained the curacy of nearby Mariansleigh. On the death of his first wife in 1751, he did not repine but promptly married Ann Bowdon, the handsome and capable daughter of an Exmoor farmer, who had all the ambition and drive of a perfect headmaster’s wife.
He also began to publish—first as an “ingenious contributor” to the Gentleman’s Magazine: and then as an author of scholarly textbooks. There followed a series of worthy productions: a Hebrew edition of the Bible (co-edited); a short grammatical textbook for schools (1759); a Dissertation on the Book of Judges (1768); and a Critical Latin Grammar (1772). In 1776, he privately printed his own political statement, A Fast Sermon, deploring the outbreak of the American War of Independence, in which he rather pithily observed that “you
might as well imagine the Almighty to create the Sun, Moon, and Stars, and then permit them to move at random, as to create Man, and not ordain Government.” One may gather from this that John Coleridge was no Anglican radical. His literary turn even reached the stage, for he adapted a Latin comedy by Terence, which he sent to Garrick at Drury Lane, under the rather tantalising title of The Fair Barhanan.
Coleridge gently deflated his father’s achievements—“the truth is, my Father was not a first-rate Genius—he was however a first-rate Christian”. He suggested that his greatest contribution to scholarship was the re-naming of the ablative case in Latin grammar with the “sonorous and expressive” term of the “Quippe-quare-quale quia-quidditive Case!” But the Reverend John Coleridge’s works were subscribed by many West Country notables, including the local MP, Judge Buller, and the local landowner Sir Stafford Northcote. In 1760 their patronage brought him the headmastership of the King Henry VIII Grammar School at Ottery St Mary, a remarkable achievement for the bankrupt draper’s son, at the age of forty-one.
At the end of this year, on the death of the incumbent, the Reverend Richard Holmes MA (a man who has left no significant trace), John Coleridge was also appointed vicar of St Mary’s, thus establishing himself as one of the leading figures in the town. His rapidly growing family soon occupied both the School House (where there were a dozen or so private pupils) and the Vicarage. These were situated in the cluster of old medieval buildings below the church in a commanding position on the top of the Cornhill of Ottery St Mary’s. There is a surviving eighteenth-century aquatint showing the Vicarage, divided from the churchyard by a sunken lane. Here a stout, old-fashioned gentleman in clerical knee-breeches and broad-brimmed hat is mounting a horse. This is the Reverend John preparing for a pastoral visit.
Next door, Sir Stafford Northcote kept his town residence in the Warden House; and at the end of the sunken lane stood Chanter’s House in extensive grounds, eventually to become the family home of the most successful of the tribe. By the time of little Sam’s birth in 1772, the three surviving half-sisters (“my aunts”) were married and living away; and the eldest boy, John, then aged eighteen, had already departed as a soldier to India. The remaining family at Ottery consisted of William, then sixteen, who would prove a scholar; James, thirteen, who would become a successful career soldier in England; Edward, twelve, destined to become a clergyman and “the wit” of the family; George, eight, who would become a headmaster like his father; Luke, seven, who would train as a doctor; Anne, five, universally loved and affectionately known as “Nancy” by all her brothers; and Francis, two, the most handsome and dashing of the boys, who would also go to India. “All my Brothers are remarkably handsome,” observed Coleridge mournfully, “but they were as inferior to Francis as I am to them.” This question of “inferiority” was to be a recurring anxiety of the youngest, uncertain whether he was the Benjamin or the black sheep.
Product details
- ASIN : B004J4WNJY
- Publisher : Pantheon; Reprint edition (January 26, 2011)
- Publication date : January 26, 2011
- Language : English
- File size : 6817 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Not Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 448 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,856,289 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #886 in Books & Reading Literary Criticism
- #3,058 in Historical U.S. Biographies
- #4,145 in Historical British Biographies
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Richard Holmes was one of Britain's most distinguished and eminent military historians and broadcasters. For many years Professor of Military and Security Studies at Cranfield University and the Royal Military College of Science, he also taught military history at Sandhurst. He was the author of many best-selling and widely acclaimed books including Redcoat, Tommy, Marlborough and Wellington, and famous for his BBC series such as War Walks, In the Footsteps of Churchill and Wellington. He served in the Territorial Army, retiring as a brigadier and Britain's most senior reservist, and was Colonel of the Princess of Wales's Royal Regiment from 1999 to 2007. Richard Holmes died suddenly in April 2011 from pneumonia. He had been suffering from non-Hodgkins' Lymphoma.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The result is an outstanding example of conventional literary biography, but one that is insensitive to growth, imagination, and mind in the act of making the mind -- or why Coleridge was passionate about them. Those interested in these must seek elsewhere, but this volume remains a good place to learn the facts of Coleridge's life, despite its dry prose.
Top reviews from other countries
By the time I had read the last chapter of Coleridge: early Visions, I was more than aware that not only is biography entirely worthy of a university chair but that Richard Holmes is the supreme master of it. On the face of it the biographer's challenge seems simple enough if all they set out to do is answer the question ; 'who was X and what did they do?'. But pause for a moment; ask yourself 'who am I?' and suddenly the simple challenge looks like an entire mountain range. If defining oneself is the slipperiest of all tasks then just exactly where does one begin to define someone else? Of course there is the advantage of objectivity – it is, after all, easier to define something from the outside in rather than vice versa. However the biographer is naturally at the mercy of contemporary accounts and opinions which are necessarily partial and have to be teased out of their context to make any objective sense. Then there is the even greater challenge of getting into the subjects head – relatively easy when considering oneself, however subjective, but almost impossible when considering someone else, especially if that someone has been dead for a century and a half.
It's here that Holmes excels. The sub-text of this remarkable book is Holmes's deep and palpable grasp of human psychology – a skill which would seem axiomatic in a biographer but frequently lacking. The problem arises from the common but, in my view, a flawed approach to the discipline vis; is the intention of the book I plan to write to praise or to bury? The former invariably turns out to be hagiographical, the latter just mean. Either way it turns out to be a rather unsatisfying meal. The great pitfall of the biography arises from the writer's tendency to believe that people who achieve remarkable things are, ipso facto, remarkable people. Of course this is true to some degree. Coleridge was undoubtedly a genius by most definitions of the word and, what shines through this book, is his extraordinary charm. It truly is a skill worthy of note to be able to enter a room and beguile all it's occupants in very short time; something which by all accounts Coleridge had in spades.
Where Holmes triumphs where other's fail is to constantly remind us, in the subtlest but most persuasive of ways that, despite his genius, here was a man who suffered from all the human frailties of us mere mortals. As Mme Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel observed 'No man is a hero to his valet'. In this book Holmes becomes Coleridge's valet for us – fully aware of his almost unworldly talents but never blinded by them. It may be true to some degree that 'by their deeds shall they be known' but what is infinitely more interesting is not what a person does but why they do them. In truth, we shall never really know. Due to the duplicitous nature of the human who continually thinks one thing and does another, we can only speculate. Lucky we have someone of the skill of Richard Holmes to guide us. Ever mindful of the inner-self, the manner in which he sifts the evidence and present it to us has such a ring of authenticity that for the few happy hours that one spends with this book one also feels that as close to spending some happy hours with Coleridge and his equally remarkable coterie, as could be imagined.
As the books ends at a new beginning I have 'Darker Reflections', the second part of Holmes's life of Coleridge, lined up and ready to go. I can't wait.
Footnote: I happened to be in Somerset a couple of weeks ago and couldn't resist a visit to Nether Stowey. The little cottage is so changed over the years and so smeared about with National Trust paint that any sort of sense of Coleridge's presence or of his time was almost impossible. I got far more from this book than I could ever hope to have actually 'being there' as it were. Surely no greater proof of the transporting effect of the written word, properly executed, is needed.