Digital List Price: | $12.80 |
Kindle Price: | $9.99 Save $2.81 (22%) |
Sold by: | Amazon.com Services LLC |
Your Memberships & Subscriptions
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism Kindle Edition
What are the arguments for and against religion and religious belief--all of them--right across the range of reasons and motives that people have for being religious, and do they stand up to scrutiny? Can there be a clear, full statement of these arguments that once and for all will show what is at stake in this debate?
Equally important: what is the alternative to religion as a view of the world and a foundation for morality? Is there a worldview and a code of life for thoughtful people--those who wish to live with intellectual integrity, based on reason, evidence, and a desire to do and be good--that does not interfere with people's right to their own beliefs and freedom of expression?
In The Case Against Religion, Anthony Grayling offers a definitive examination of these questions, and an in-depth exploration of the humanist outlook that recommends itself as the ethics of the genuinely reflective person.
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherBloomsbury USA
- Publication dateMarch 26, 2013
- File size698 KB
Customers who bought this item also bought
Editorial Reviews
Review
“Debunks the teleological, ontological and cosmological arguments employed throughout Christendom for the literal existence of God…Those looking for a succinct analysis of these centuries old debates will appreciate Grayling's insights.” ―The Washington Post, "On Faith"
“London-based academic and philosopher Grayling (To Set Prometheus Free, 2010, etc.) has the sharp analytical mind of fellow naysayer Richard Dawkins, though he is gentler about saying no to God or god or gods...readers looking for fire-and-brimstone contrarianism will want to turn to Dawkins or the late Christopher Hitchens instead. Mild though the rebuke is, a readable and persuasvie argument - if, of course, an exercise in preaching to the choir.” ―Kirkus Reviews
About the Author
Product details
- ASIN : B009SJZNS8
- Publisher : Bloomsbury USA; 1st edition (March 26, 2013)
- Publication date : March 26, 2013
- Language : English
- File size : 698 KB
- Text-to-Speech : Enabled
- Screen Reader : Supported
- Enhanced typesetting : Enabled
- X-Ray : Enabled
- Word Wise : Enabled
- Sticky notes : On Kindle Scribe
- Print length : 289 pages
- Best Sellers Rank: #570,963 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #136 in Atheism (Kindle Store)
- #312 in Atheism (Books)
- #417 in Religious Philosophy (Kindle Store)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
A.C. Grayling is Professor of Philosophy and Principal of the New College of the Humanities at Northeastern University London. He believes that philosophy should take an active, useful role in society. He has written and edited many books, both scholarly and for a general readership, and has been a regular contributor to The Times, Financial Times, Observer, Independent on Sunday, Economist, Literary Review, New Statesman and Prospect, and is a frequent and popular contributor to radio and television programmes, including Newsnight, Today, In Our Time, Start the Week and CNN news. He is a former Fellow of the World Economic Forum at Davos, a Vice President of the British Humanist Association, an Honorary Associate of the National Secular Society, Patron of the UK Armed Forces Humanist association, Patron of Dignity in Dying, a former Booker Prize Judge, a Fellow of the Royal Literary Society, a member of the human rights group IHEU represented at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva; and much more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
In the general sense, anyone who thinks about life is a philosopher. Grayling is different only in that he makes philosophy his vocation; Dawkins is a scientist, and Hitchens was a journalist and writer. This is a deep, thoughtful book for intelligent, well-read, and open-minded people who are interested in knowing the case against religion. Grayling does more than that. In the second part of his book he presents an argument for Humanism, of which, contrary to the previous reviewer's claim, Grayling has a great deal to say. "Humanism", he says, "is the concern to draw the best from, and make the best of, human life in the span of the human lifetime, in the real world, and in sensible accord with the facts of humanity as these are shaped and constrained by the world. This entails that humanism rejects religious claims about the source of morality and value." As a word, "humanism" has a relatively short history but the ethical tradition it carries goes back in history "older by nearly a millennium than Christianity".
Grayling discusses specific topics under chapter headings such as "Humanism and the Ends of Life". The religious tend to lean in favour of what they call the "pro-life" position in respect of issues such as voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted death as well as abortion. He explains, clearly, and in detail, why the religious attitude represents "an egregious example of the `I don't like it therefore you are not allowed to do it' mentality which is what makes moralism of that kind so profoundly objectionable." He offers a fresh and practical suggestion for those who fear that mistakes might be made in the voluntary euthanasia process - that is, by creating a medical sub-division of anaesthesiology where specialists can work within the framework of law and under the supervision of a hospital ethics committee.
There are many fresh ideas that the reader can find in this clear and accessible book. Not only will he find good reasons to reject belief in any supernatural deity, but he will find that that is a much sounder basis for behaving ethically and living morally, something many Christians believe is impossible without God. Grayling shows that, in fact, it is impossible with God. He shows why "the world is far more consistent with the existence of an evil deity than a good deity". Citing Amos 3:6, "Does evil befall a city, and the Lord has not done it?" and Isaiah 45:5 "I make peace and create evil; I am the Lord who does all these things", and Job 2:10 "Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive evil?" Even so, as Grayling reminded us, the Anglican Church has since 1996 abolished the idea of Hell as a place of eternal punishment. Now, the Church of England says that hell is just "the absence of God". Other Christians disagree with the COE position, which therefore makes it terribly difficult to know what to believe about God.
If you enjoy this book you might like Mark Roncace's "Raw Revelation: The Bible They Never Tell You About", and also Lawrence Wright's account of the creation of the Church of Scientology in "Going Clear".
"The God Argument" is a very respectful, thought-provoking and accessible book that addresses the case against religion while making the compelling case for a superior ethical way of living, humanism. Accomplished author and English philosopher, A.C. Grayling, provides the reader with an excellent modern reference to the most important philosophical questions of ethics and morality. This stimulating 288-page book is broken into two parts: Part I - Against Religion, and Part II - For Humanism.
Positives:
1. Elegant dignified prose. The author is very respectful and treats this fascinating topic with utmost respect and care.
2. A philosophical focus on the most interesting topic, religion.
3. The author has a great command of the topic and does a masterful job of keeping it an accessible level without compromising the intellectual core of the topic.
4. The reality of contesting religion. "Contesting religion is like engaging in a boxing match with jelly: it is a shifting, unclear, amorphous target, which every blow displaces to a new shape".
5. You never feel lost in this book. The author does a great job of staying focused on the task in hand, "In my view, the argument against religion is an argument for the liberation of the human mind, and the possibility of at last formulating an ethical outlook that humankind can share, thus providing a basis for a much more integrated and peaceful world."
6. Does a good job of defining terms smoothly within the context of the narrative.
7. Thought-provoking ideas and concepts that challenge the trend, "This fact about the Chinese, the most numerous people on Earth and a large fraction of the Earth's human population, gives the lie to the theory that belief in a god is hard-wired in the human brain."
8. The inconsistencies of religious beliefs, "The evidence of the world is in fact far more consistent with the existence of an evil deity than a good deity, or at least a deity capable of evil and more than occasionally intent on causing it; but this is not a line that many religious apologists take."
9. The roots of religion, "Religion is exactly the same kind of thing as astrology: it originates in the pre-scientific, rudimentary metaphysics of our ancestors."
10. How science claims differ from religious ones. "Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so . . ."
11. Debunking the three most popular arguments for "God": argument from design (teleological), ontological argument, and the cosmological argument. Strong arguments against the theistic claims.
12. The dismantling of Pascal's wager and the poor moral argument for the existence of a deity.
13. Debunking the notion for a designer, "In short, the explanatory value of the idea of a designer or deity to `explain' in its turn the universe and the complexity of life in it is null."
14. The danger of the Creationist lobby. "No scientists would wish students not to think critically about anything."
15. The three separate debates between religion and its critics: theism-atheism debate, secularism debate, and a debate about the source and content of our moralities. Great stuff here. I enjoyed the defining of militancy.
16. Persuasive discussion on the merits of humanism. "In essence, humanism is the ethical outlook that says each individual is responsible for choosing his or her values and goals and working towards the latter in the light of the former, and is equally responsible for living considerately towards others, with a special view to establishing good relationships at the heart of life, because all good lives are premised on such."
17. A brief historical look at secular humanism. Defining the good life.
18. Differing between ethics and morality. "Morality is about what is permissible and forbidden in particular realms of behaviour; ethics is about one's character."
19. Interesting section on abortions and assisted suicide (euthanasia). "In short, euthanasia - which we should understand as `a good dying' - should be available to all of us, and not least to the ill and old if they desire it (not if someone else desires it for them)."
20. Comparing laws involving blasphemy. "Compare this to now-repealed nineteenth-century laws in certain states of the United States, where the penalty for anyone who `wilfully blasphemes the holy name of God by denying, cursing or contumeliously reproaching God, His creation, government or final judging of the world, or by cursing or contumeliously reproaching Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost, or by cursing or contumeliously reproaching or exposing to contempt and ridicule, the holy word of God contained in the holy scriptures' was anything up to a year in jail and a fine not exceeding $300."
21. One of my favorite points in the book, "Morality has to be grounded and justified independently of claims about the existence of gods or other supernatural agencies and what they are said to demand of their creatures."
Negatives:
1. My biggest criticism of the book is the lack of citations; there was a total of forty to be exact. A well-written and provocative book like this warranted more.
2. My instinct tells me the book was rushed based on a couple of misspells that I caught (career, installment) and the aforementioned lack of citations. Not a major issue just not to the standards one expects from a book of Grayling's caliber.
3. This book is intended for the masses and I must say I am grateful for the approach but for the more demanding reader and scholarly philosophers it may lack depth.
4. No mention of the now popular yet debunked Kalam version of the Cosmological argument.
5. Didn't go after the concept of the soul, spirit, or some of the other popular metaphysical claims.
6. No formal bibliography.
In summary, this is a solid and enjoyable book to read. I can see myself going back to this book as reference. The author makes very solid, civil arguments against the claims of religion while convincingly pushing forward a more favorable ethical manner of living. Putting aside, the lack of citations and lack of depth in some areas, this is a highly recommended book!
Further suggestions: " Why Does the World Exist?: An Existential Detective Story " by Jim Holt, " Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity " and " The End of Christianity " by John Loftus, " Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism " by Richard Carrier, " Natural Atheism " and " Atheism Advanced: Further Thoughts of a Freethinker " by Dr. David Eller, " Man Made God: A Collection of Essays " by Barbara G. Walker, " The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values " by Sam Harris, " The World Is Not as We Think It Is " by Dennis Littrell, " Immortality: The Quest to Live Forever and How It Drives Civilization " by Stephen Cave, , "God: The Failed Hypothesis. How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist" by Victor J. Stenger, "Godless" by Dan Barker, "Christian No More" by Jeffrey Mark, and "The Invention of God" by Bill Lauritzen.
Top reviews from other countries
The problem with Communism is that they knew the dangers and downside of religion, but they didn't have an alternative to it. So, when they abolished religion it created a huge vacuum in the lives of people; and in the absence of an alternative, they created their own gods and their own dogmas to fill that vacuum. In order to enforce those dogmas, they used the same cruelty, torture, killings and other fear tactics that were used by religion in the past and are still used by religious extremists and fanatics. Today, as more and more people are turning away from religion 'humanism' may be a good candidate to fill that vacuum.
Now, just think for a moment. We are supposed to be the best/finest specimen of 4 billion years of evolution of life on Earth. And we are still hurting and killing one another simply because we can't get over some Iron Age fantasies and dogmas, and let our reptilian instincts dominate our lives-- if we are not careful we may even annihilate our own species. It is pathetic, truly.
The book is very well argued, and especially the second part is very helpful for someone who wants to live without religion or other kinds of dogmatic philosophy.
The second half of the book trumpets the Case FOR Humanism as a way of living and is equally rational in its approach. Indeed, rationality and logic infuse everything Grayling discusses...and his `general knowledge' is truly astounding.
Having said all that, I feel the book `fails' to this extent: the converted need not be `preached' to (although they will, after reading this, have many more `slings and arrows' to add to their `outrageous' arsenal!) and the `none so blind...' will simply do verbal, emotional and illogical gymnastics to justify their continued adherence to their religion in spite of NO constantly empirical data confirming the existence of a controlling `entity' whom we must worship, to whom we must give praise, to whom we may ask for `favours' and who, at the end of our life `judges' us, as a consequence of which we are `rewarded' or `punished'.
All-in-all, however, the acuity of his vision and the unrestrained meticulous attention to the rational make this one of THE most thought-provoking books I have ever had the privilege to read. A page-turner it most assuredly is NOT but the rewards for serious consideration of, and reflection on, A.C.Grayling's `The God Argument' are exquisitely multifaceted.