Digital List Price:	$29.99
Kindle Price:	$21.99 Save $8.00 (27%)
Sold by:	Amazon.com Services LLC

Promotions apply when you purchase

Add an

audiobook with Audible narration for $7.49

Audiobook Price: $17.46

Save: $9.97 (57%)

eBook features:

Highlight, take notes, and search in the book
In this edition, page numbers are just like the physical edition

Read with our free app

You've subscribed to ! We will preorder your items within 24 hours of when they become available. When new books are released, we'll charge your default payment method for the lowest price available during the pre-order period.

Update your device or payment method, cancel individual pre-orders or your subscription at
Your Memberships & Subscriptions

There was an error. We were unable to process your subscription due to an error. Please refresh and try again.

Follow the author

Katherine J. Cramer

+ Follow

More books from this author

The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker (Chicago Studies in American Politics) Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition

by Katherine J. Cramer (Author) Format: Kindle Edition

4.4 214 ratings

Part of: Chicago Studies in American Politics (62 books)

See all formats and editions

“An important contribution to the literature on contemporary American politics. Both methodologically and substantively, it breaks new ground.” —Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare

When Scott Walker was elected Governor of Wisconsin, the state became the focus of debate about the appropriate role of government. In a time of rising inequality, Walker not only survived a bitterly contested recall, he was subsequently reelected. But why were the very people who would benefit from strong government services so vehemently against the idea of big government?

With The Politics of Resentment, Katherine J. Cramer uncovers an oft-overlooked piece of the puzzle: rural political consciousness and the resentment of the “liberal elite.” Rural voters are distrustful that politicians will respect the distinct values of their communities and allocate a fair share of resources. What can look like disagreements about basic political principles are therefore actually rooted in something even more fundamental: who we are as people and how closely a candidate’s social identity matches our own.

Taking a deep dive into Wisconsin’s political climate, Cramer illuminates the contours of rural consciousness, showing how place-based identities profoundly influence how people understand politics. The Politics of Resentment shows that rural resentment—no less than partisanship, race, or class—plays a major role in dividing America against itself.

Editorial Reviews

Review

“Helps answer a question that has been plaguing political commentators since last November: Why did Donald Trump win in Wisconsin? Everyone has a theory—Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategies, Trump’s appeal to protectionism, GOP voter suppression—and most of them have some truth. But one must also understand Wisconsin, a so-called purple state with a stark urban/rural divide, if one is to understand the national rage that swept Trump into the White House. . . . [Politics of Resentment] illuminate[s] the state’s Republican shift and chart[s] a way forward for reversing it.” ― Nation Published On: 2017-07-20

“Cramer spent years carefully listening to ‘ordinary’ people talking about politics and power, then used their words to produce an indelible portrait of the mind and heart of contemporary populism. The Politics of Resentment is the smartest, richest, and most humane work of political science I have read in a very long time.” -- Larry M. Bartels, Vanderbilt University

"The Politics of Resentment is an important contribution to the literature on contemporary American politics. Both methodologically and substantively, it breaks new ground." ― Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare

"One wishes more scholars followed Cramer’s lead. . . . this is a well-written and theoretically rich
book. Given recent events, it provides a much-needed corrective to the more journalistic accounts of white working-class voters, ones bereft of the rigor Cramer deploys. The Politics of Resentment, to my mind, is required reading to understand rural support for Scott Walker in Wisconsin; and also what might motivate Trump supporters more generally. Cramer’s book deserves all of the attention it’s received thus far." ― Public Opinion Quarterly

"The Politics of Resentment is eye-opening. It has taught me more about my country than any other book or article I have read in many years." ― Journal of Communication

“The Politics of Resentment is a breath of fresh air in the study of American public opinion. Intense partisan polarization has reached down into the ranks of everyday citizens’ perceptions of one another. Wisconsin is on the extreme end of this intense polarization that cuts along the lines of metropolitan liberals and non-metropolitan resentful conservatives, but these fault lines run deep across the nation. Cramer adds new dimensions of evidence and analysis to this dynamic. Her book will be widely read and debated, and it will help to reset the questions we ask about political worldviews in America.” -- Theda Skocpol, Harvard University, director of the Scholars Strategy Network

“Cramer develops a new theory and uses it to show how identity-based rural resentments animate much public opinion in Wisconsin. Governor Scott Walker’s success in cutting government and weakening unions makes Cramer’s study of Badger state politics especially important. This is pathbreaking work.” -- John Zaller, University of California, Los Angeles

About the Author

Katherine J. Cramer is professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, where she is also director of the Morgridge Center for Public Service and an affiliate faculty member in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, the LaFollette School of Public Affairs, the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, the Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education, and the Center for Community and Nonprofit Studies. She is the author of Talking about Race and Talking about Politics, both also published by the University of Chicago Press.

Product details

ASIN ‏ : ‎ B01BWMDZS8
Publisher ‏ : ‎ The University of Chicago Press; Illustrated edition (March 23, 2016)
Publication date ‏ : ‎ March 23, 2016
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 1928 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 300 pages

Best Sellers Rank: #500,698 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
- #49 in Rural Sociology
- #101 in Political Parties (Kindle Store)
- #184 in Campaigns & Elections

Customer Reviews:
4.4 214 ratings

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!

Upload your video

About the author

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Katherine J. Cramer

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.

Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5

214 global ratings

How customer reviews and ratings work

Sort reviews by

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Terrence Walsh

Rural REALLY IS different. Anyone paying attention?

Reviewed in the United States on February 9, 2017

Verified Purchase

This book has been invaluable for understanding some of the factors that made Donald Trump the 45th President of the U.S.

Much of the news media still misses this viewpoint.
Much of the coastal Democrats still miss this viewpoint.

Not just insightful and instructive. Text is brisk and easy to read. Anecdotes are enjoyable means to convey truths. The author engaged in quite a marathon of travel and then repeat travel to get to know small groups of people throughout rural Wisconsin. This is not a "scientific survey" in the laboratory sense, but that's okay--those rural folks are not in laboratories, or in urban or suburban settings. People may see things differently when the population density is at the low end of the spectrum compared to the middle and high ends.

Rural is different. I've always known that. Thanks, Prof. Cramer, for making that visible.

I hope one or two will find this review helpful.

6 people found this helpful

Helpful

Mary Cleveland

What's The Matter with Wisconsin?

Reviewed in the United States on May 2, 2017

Verified Purchase

Katherine Cramer, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, thought she was perfectly suited for her project of interviewing upstate Wisconsin residents on their political views. Wisconsin born and bred, she felt deeply connected to her state. So she was quite stunned by the open hostility she encountered. If she was a professor, the locals demanded, how come she was here upstate with her tape recorder, rather than teaching her students? Who was teaching her students in her absence? It often took Cramer several visits to gain trust.

Upstate Wisconsin, north of Milwaukee and Madison, is mostly rural, overwhelmingly white, and accounts for about half the population of the state. From 2007 to 2012, Cramer interviewed some forty different groups, many repeatedly. These were people who met regularly, around the coffee machine in a service station, in the back room of a café, and so on. There was even a group that met to play a special Wisconsin dice game, at which Cramer excelled. The interviewees ranged from working class loggers in the north, to middle-class small-business owners. Over half were men, and many were older or retired. They appeared to be stable, established community members, sometimes political leaders. Cramer’s interviews bridged the election of Scott Walker in 2010 and the unsuccessful recall election against him in 2012. She published her findings in 2016 BT (Before Trump) as The Politics of Resentment.

She quickly identified a perspective she called “rural consciousness”: Her interviewees highly prized a self-sufficient outdoor lifestyle of low pay, privation, and hard physical labor; they viewed Madison and Milwaukee—“the M&Ms”—with suspicion and contempt. City folks, including professionals, government employees and academics—these led an easy life sitting behind desks, for which they were grossly overpaid. “Madison” (the capital) did not listen to rural folks, did not care about them, and looked down on them; it simply took their tax money and did not return their fair share in services. Just look at the empty streets and shuttered stores of declining small towns! In short, rural people, were “deserving”; those others were “undeserving.”

Cramer explored this resentment. Did rural areas really pay more in taxes than they got in benefits? In fact, the opposite—but that was irrelevant, since the locals regarded much government spending as “waste.” Was it the 2008 collapse and Great Recession? No. Small towns had been declining for decades; maybe only a bit more after 2008. Was it an ideological preference for low taxes and small government? No. They would gladly pay taxes for new school computers; but not on salaries for those lazy undeserving school teachers! Yes, even local school teachers were regarded as agents of “Madison”! Was it racism? Cramer did hear some openly racist remarks—directed at “lazy” residents of an upstate Native American reservation. Negative remarks about “those people in Milwaukee” may have meant racial minorities, but more often designated the despised urban elites, especially government bureaucrats. Cramer did discover one striking fact: in upstate communities the pay, benefits, and job security of public employees significantly exceeded those of private sector workers. Perhaps that helped make them lightning rods for resentment—and led to support for Governor Walker’s cuts in their pay and benefits.

Cramer probed: Why did people who complained of the high cost of health insurance in rural areas nonetheless oppose government efforts to expand health services? Over and over she heard something like, “the government must be mishandling my hard-earned dollars, because my taxes are going up and clearly they are not coming back to benefit people like me. So why would I want an expansion of government?”
In the end, Cramer was left with a mystery: rural resentment towards cities was hardly new. Nor was it new for politicians like Scott Walker to play to that resentment. But what made that resentment so powerful today and so focused on government at all levels?

Bitter resentment of government might seem plausible in a state like Louisiana given its inequality, corruption, and poor public services (see my review of Arlie Hochschild’s Strangers in Their Own Land in the November/December 2016 issue of Dollars & Sense). But in squeaky-clean Wisconsin? While the British Equality Trust rates Louisiana among the worst states on both inequality and social and health problems, it rates Wisconsin among the best. Wisconsin boasts excellent schools and health services statewide. Until Scott Walker, it was a reliably progressive Democratic state. What happened?

To me, it feels almost like a gathering religious movement, a rebellion against evil oppressors sometimes disguised as school teachers, postal clerks, and firemen. Is it in some twisted way a response to growing national inequality? There’s at least one small glimmer of hope: In the Wisconsin primary of April 5, Bernie Sanders got significantly more votes than any other candidate, including Donald Trump.

18 people found this helpful

Helpful

Arthur Digbee

Time for rural Wisconsin to listen back

Reviewed in the United States on September 3, 2017

Verified Purchase

Katherine Cramer spent a couple years traveling to small-town Wisconsin to listen to people about politics. She’s a great listener, and this book is the result. It’s a bit repetitive in places, and too much of the account reflects a relatively small share of her groups. Still, it’s a great window into the collective minds of the small-town Midwest.

Her core argument concerns how rural resentment of urban people and their governments shapes both rural identity and their politics. It’s obviously a timely book in light of Trump’s ability to tap that resentment in a few key states such as Wisconsin. That said, there are some elements of Cramer’s findings that raised questions in my mind, questions that she leaves hanging. Without those answers, it’s hard to know how American politics should move forward.

One striking element of the conversations was that public employees in each community were grouped with state government. Someone raised in their town who taught at the local high school for thirty years was, in their worldview, resented as an agent of Madison. The people they grew up with have become villains in their eyes because they teach school. That’s not only sad, but it reflects a disconnection with reality. The high school math teacher who grew up in town is part of the community by any definition.

Another villain in rural Wisconsin is the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which manages things like hunting and fishing, regulates pollution. Some of Cramer’s people talk about being afraid of the DNR catching them poaching deer or overfishing, both of which are illegal of course. In the same breadth, these people will say, “and the DNR rules don’t even work! The fishing is terrible these days, and there aren’t any more deer.” Apparently it does not cross their minds that their community of poachers might be responsible for the decline of deer and fish. These communities seem blind to a basic fact about how game management works.

That’s a nice illustration of how much cow manure came through in these conversations. Rural Wisconsin believes that they pay more taxes than the cities (they don’t), and that they get less state spending (they don’t). Cramer gently documents other things that just aren’t so, but she always says that it’s important for the rest of us to listen to these voices. I agree that we need to listen to these voices, some of whom are my neighbors too. I think it’s also important to think about where these voices are coming from – where are they getting these falsehoods? I have some thoughts, but I won’t share them here.

Having been heard, I think it’s important that the people rural Wisconsin do some listening of their own. For people who claim to believe in personal responsibility, they don’t take much responsibility themselves. If they believe that people can succeed through hard work, and if they really work as hard as they claim, why aren’t they succeeding? If, as they recognize, you need an education for the good jobs, why don’t they get an education? If there are no jobs in their community, why don’t they move where the jobs are? If gas is so expensive, why don’t they move into town? I’ve had my own conversations with people in these towns where they complain about their lazy, no-good relatives who won’t get off their behinds and get a job. Cramer didn’t seem to find many of these kinds of people in her samples.

Because of her research strategy, Cramer missed the rural Wisconsinites who moved to town and got a good job. Instead, she talked to the older generation, which tends to complain about their children and grandchildren having left these small towns for small cities like Eau Claire or Wausau. The old folks of rural Wisconsin might listen to their own grandkids.

46 people found this helpful

Helpful

T. Chojnacki

Very good book

Reviewed in the United States on March 13, 2017

Verified Purchase

Very well researched and well written. I lived in rural Wisconsin for five years (the two closest municipality had populations less than 1,000 residents). This book gave me a deeper appreciation of the thinking of my former neighbors. Although it is about rural Wisconsin, I can imagine it applies to any rural area of the US. I hope there is a follow up discussing Trump's victory in Wisconsin

2 people found this helpful

Helpful

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English

Jonathan Krall

Five Stars

Reviewed in Canada on June 20, 2017

Verified Purchase

Excellent read on a topic that is important.

irina

Darum gibt es Trump!

Reviewed in Germany on February 15, 2017

Verified Purchase

Schwer zu lesen, aber sehr informativ. Wer wissen will, warumTrump am Ruder ist,dem empfehle ich das Buch. Armes , trauriges Land USA.

Translate review to English

David Howie

A must read

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on January 15, 2017

Verified Purchase

Recommended to all politics philosophy and economics student's. Also, of interest to anyone interested in research methods.

Found the book, perhaps used used social science terminology which general public may not follow at first. Still gets 5 starts

Buy for others

Buying and sending eBooks to others

Follow the author

Image Unavailable

The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker (Chicago Studies in American Politics) Illustrated Edition, Kindle Edition

Editorial Reviews

Review

About the Author

Product details

Videos

About the author

Katherine J. Cramer

Customer reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

Top reviews from other countries